Literature DB >> 10879789

Saccadic and psychophysical discrimination of double targets.

A P Aitsebaomo1, H E Bedell.   

Abstract

Saccades are rapid, conjugate eye movements that shift the foveas onto peripheral targets of interest. However, the initial saccades to a peripheral pair of targets have been reported to direct the foveas between the targets, despite instructions to look at one or the other. This phenomenon, referred to as saccadic averaging, can occur for target separations of 10 degrees or more and is usually interpreted as evidence that the spatial information available to the saccadic system is of inherently poor resolution. We compared the amplitudes of initial saccades to single peripheral targets and to pairs of targets, with and without prior auditory cues that provided unambiguous information about which target represented the saccadic goal. Target duration ranged from 33 to 100 ms, followed by a mask that was intended to limit neural processing time. The results show that supplementary auditory cues reduce the extent of saccadic averaging to target separations as small as 2 degrees. Saccadic averaging is more pronounced for targets of brief duration, consistent with the degradation of psychophysical resolution that occurs for targets of short duration. We conclude that saccadic averaging results in large part because of ambiguity about which of two targets represents the saccadic goal and, to a lesser extent, because of the limited time that is available before the saccade to process target position.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10879789     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200006000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Advance information modulates the global effect even without instruction on where to look.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Tandra Ghose; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensory processing of motor inaccuracy depends on previously performed movement and on subsequent motor corrections: a study of the saccadic system.

Authors:  Muriel Panouillères; Christian Urquizar; Roméo Salemme; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visual information is required to reduce the global effect.

Authors:  Kiki Arkesteijn; Mieke Donk; Jeroen B J Smeets; Artem V Belopolsky
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades.

Authors:  Luca Wollenberg; Heiner Deubel; Martin Szinte
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Visual attention and eye movement control during oculomotor competition.

Authors:  Luca Wollenberg; Nina M Hanning; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.