Literature DB >> 23559366

Advance information modulates the global effect even without instruction on where to look.

Frouke Hermens1, Tandra Ghose, Johan Wagemans.   

Abstract

When observers are asked to make an eye movement to a visual target in the presence of a near distractor, their eyes tend to land on a position in between the target and the distractor, an effect known as the global effect. While it was initially believed that the global effect is a mandatory eye movement strategy, recent studies have shown that explicit instructions to make an eye movement to a certain part of the scene can overrule the effect. We here investigate whether such top-down influences are also found when people are not actively involved in an explicit eye movement task, but instead, make eye movements in the service of another task. Participants were presented with arrays of yellow and green discs, each containing a letter, and were asked to identify a target letter. Because the discs were presented away from fixation, participants made an eye movement to the array of discs on most of the trials. An analysis of the landing sites of these eye movements revealed that, even without an explicit instruction, observers take the advance information about the colour of the disc containing the target into account before moving their eyes. Moreover, when asking participants to maintain fixation for intervals of different durations, it was found that the implicit top-down influences operated on a very similar time-scale as previously observed for explicit eye movement instructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23559366     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3480-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Saccadic and psychophysical discrimination of double targets.

Authors:  A P Aitsebaomo; H E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?

Authors:  John M Findlay; Hazel I Blythe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Oculomotor distraction by signals invisible to the retinotectal and magnocellular pathways.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Saccadic inhibition reveals the timing of automatic and voluntary signals in the human brain.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Saccade target selection during visual search.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Saccade-related activity in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of burst and buildup cells.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system.

Authors:  F P Ottes; J A Van Gisbergen; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Between-object and within-object saccade programming in a visual search task.

Authors:  Dorine Vergilino-Perez; John M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.