Literature DB >> 10875628

The relationship between reaction to sudden, intermittent movements and sounds and temperament.

J L Lanier1, T Grandin, R D Green, D Avery, K McGee.   

Abstract

Casual observations indicated that some cattle are more sensitive to sudden movement or intermittent sound than other cattle. Six commercial livestock auctions in two states and a total of 1,636 cattle were observed to assess the relationship between breed, sex, and temperament score on the response to sudden, intermittent visual and sound stimuli, such as the ringman swinging his arm for a bid and the sound of him briefly yelling a bid. A 4-point temperament score was used to score each animal while it was in the ring. The scores used were 1) walks and(or) stands still, with slow, smooth body movements; 2) continuously walks or trots, and vigilant; 3) gait is faster than a trot (runs even a couple of steps), with fast, abrupt, jerky movements, and very vigilant; and 4) hits the ring fence, walls, partitions, or people with its head. Animals were observed for flinches, startle responses, or orientation toward sudden, intermittent sounds, motions, and tactile stimulation, such as being touched with a cane or plastic paddle. The cattle observed were mostly Bos taurus beef breeds and Holstein dairy cattle. Holsteins were more sound-sensitive (P = .02) and touch-sensitive (P < .01) than beef cattle. Sensitivity to sudden, intermittent stimuli (e.g., sound, motion, and touch) increased as temperament score (excitability) increased. Cattle with a temperament score of 1 were the least sensitive to sudden, intermittent movement and sound and those with a temperament score of 4 were the most sensitive (P < .01). This same relationship was sometimes observed for touch but was not statistically significant. Motion-sensitive cattle were more likely than nonsensitive cattle to score a temperament rating of 3 or 4 (P < .01). Steers and heifers were more motion-sensitive than the older bulls and cows (P = .03). Beef cattle urinated (P < .01, n = 1,581) and defecated (P < .01, n = 1,582) more often in the ring than did dairy cattle. Cattle that became agitated during handling in an auction ring were the individuals that were most likely to be startled by sudden, intermittent sounds and movements. Reactivity to sudden, intermittent stimuli may be an indicator of an excitable temperament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875628     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7861467x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Identification of selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for dairy production.

Authors:  Alessandra Stella; Paolo Ajmone-Marsan; Barbara Lazzari; Paul Boettcher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

3.  Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments: social, nutritional, and carcass quality considerations.

Authors:  Reinaldo F Cooke; Courtney L Daigle; Philipe Moriel; Stephen B Smith; Luis O Tedeschi; João M B Vendramini
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Regular Exposure to Cowbells Affects the Behavioral Reactivity to a Noise Stimulus in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Julia Johns; Sophie Masneuf; Antonia Patt; Edna Hillmann
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 5.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Active inference, stressors, and psychological trauma: A neuroethological model of (mal)adaptive explore-exploit dynamics in ecological context.

Authors:  Adam Linson; Thomas Parr; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.332

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.