Literature DB >> 22766678

The effect of paramagnetic contrast in choline peak in patients with glioblastoma multiforme might not be significant.

E C Lima1, M C G Otaduy, M Tsunemi, R Pincerato, E F Cardoso, S Rosemberg, P H Aguiar, G G Cerri, C C Leite.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: (1)H-MR spectroscopy is a useful tool in brain tumor evaluation. A critical point in obtaining representative spectra is the correct voxel positioning, which can be more accurate after Gd administration. Some experimental data suggested that Gd could cause Cho signal loss. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of Gd in the Cho peak area and width in patients with GBM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed multivoxel (1)H-MR spectroscopy before and after Gd administration in 18 patients with GBM. Quantification of Cho peak area and width in each voxel was completed, and the Cho mean and maximum values before and after Gd injection were calculated in the tumor and contralateral hemisphere. Choline peak area and width values obtained before and after contrast were compared, considering as separate entities enhancing and nonenhancing tumoral voxels and the contralateral hemisphere.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found for the Cho peak area mean values in the tumoral voxels or contralaterally (P > .05). A tendency for an increase in the Cho peak width mean value was found in the tumoral enhancing voxels (P = .055). A statistically significant decrease was found for the mean value of the maximum Cho peak area in enhancing tumoral voxels (P = .020). No significant differences were found in the nonenhancing tumoral voxels or contralaterally (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The injection of Gd before performing (1)H-MR spectroscopy might not significantly affect the Cho peak area in patients with GBM. The paramagnetic contrast seems to cause a different effect, depending on Gd enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766678      PMCID: PMC7966339          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  19 in total

Review 1.  Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain.

Authors:  S R Maheshwari; G M Fatterpekar; M Castillo; S K Mukherji
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 2.  Multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors.

Authors:  Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  MR spectroscopy of brain tumors.

Authors:  Meng Law
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-10

Review 4.  The potential of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) in the diagnosis and management of patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Xavier Leclerc; Thierry A G M Huisman; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions.

Authors:  W Möller-Hartmann; S Herminghaus; T Krings; G Marquardt; H Lanfermann; U Pilatus; F E Zanella
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  1H chemical shift imaging reveals loss of brain tumor choline signal after administration of Gd-contrast.

Authors:  P E Sijens; M J van den Bent; P J Nowak; P van Dijk; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) of human brain tumours: assessment of differences between tumour types and its applicability in brain tumour categorization.

Authors:  Carles Majós; Juli Alonso; Carles Aguilera; Marta Serrallonga; Javier Pérez-Martín; Juan J Acebes; Carles Arús; Jaume Gili
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  1H MR spectroscopy monitoring of changes in choline peak area and line shape after Gd-contrast administration.

Authors:  P E Sijens; M Oudkerk; P van Dijk; P C Levendag; C J Vecht
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Brain tumor classification based on long echo proton MRS signals.

Authors:  L Lukas; A Devos; J A K Suykens; L Vanhamme; F A Howe; C Majós; A Moreno-Torres; M Van der Graaf; A R Tate; C Arús; S Van Huffel
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.326

10.  Noninvasive histologic grading of solid astrocytomas using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Effie Z Kapsalaki; Robert L Vogel; Ioannis Fezoulidis; Joe Sam Robinson; Efstathios D Gotsis
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 1.875

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences between glioblastomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas in 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aburano; Fumiaki Ueda; Yuichi Yoshie; Osamu Matsui; Mitsutoshi Nakada; Yutaka Hayashi; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.