Literature DB >> 10861142

Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females.

J Brimacombe1, L Holyoake, C Keller, N Brimacombe, M Scully, J Barry, P Talbutt, J Sartain, P McMahon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is controversy over (1) the relative incidence of sore throat between the face mask (FM) and laryngeal mask airway (LMA), (2) the efficacy of LMA intracuff pressure reduction as a mechanism for minimizing sore throat, and (3) the relative incidence of sore throat with the LMA between males and females. In a randomized double-blind study, the authors compared laryngopharyngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort with the FM and LMA at high and low cuff volumes in males and females.
METHODS: Three hundred adult patients were randomly assigned to three equal-sized groups for airway management: (1) the FM, (2) the LMA with a fully inflated cuff (LMA-High), or (3) the LMA with a semi-inflated cuff (LMA-Low). Anesthesia was administered with propofol, nitrous oxide, oxygen, and isoflurane. In the FM group, a Guedel-type oropharyngeal airway and jaw thrust were used only if necessary. In the LMA groups, cuff inflation was achieved with either 15 or 30 ml for the size 4 (females) and 20 or 40 ml for the size 5 (males). The LMA was removed when the patient was awake. Patients were questioned 18-24 h postoperatively about surgical pain, sore throat, sore neck, sore jaw, dysphonia, and dysphagia, and about whether they were satisfied with their anesthetic.
RESULTS: The incidence of sore throat was lower in the FM (8%) than the LMA-High (42%) and LMA-Low (20%) groups (both: P < or = 0.02). The incidence of sore neck was higher for the FM (14%) than the LMA-High group (6%; P = 0.05) but similar to the LMA-Low group (8%). The incidence of sore jaw was higher in the FM (11%) than the LMA-High (3%) and LMA-Low (3%) groups (both: P = 0. 02). There were no differences among groups for surgical pain or dysphonia. The incidence of dysphagia was lower in the FM (1%) than the LMA-High group (11%; P = 0.003), but similar to the LMA-Low group (1%). The incidence of sore throat and dysphagia was lower in the LMA-Low group than the LMA-High group for both males and females (all: P < or = 0.04). There were no differences in discomfort levels between males and females in any group. Two patients from the FM group and one from the LMA-High group were not satisfied with their anesthetic. These complaints were unrelated to postoperative morbidity.
CONCLUSION: The LMA causes more sore throat and dysphagia but less jaw pain than the FM. Sore throat and dysphagia are more common with the LMA if the initial cuff volume is high. There are no differences in discomfort levels between males and females. However, these discomforts do not influence patient satisfaction after LMA or FM anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10861142     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  34 in total

1.  [Comparison of two different laryngeal mask models for airway management in patients with immobilization of the cervical spine].

Authors:  C Gernoth; O Jandewerth; M Contzen; J Hinkelbein; H Genzwürker
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Spring recoil and supraglottic airway devices: lessons from the law of conservation of energy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Sorbello; Ivana Zdravkovic; Rita Cataldo; Ida Di Giacinto
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

4.  The effect of esophagogastroduodenoscopy probe insertion on the intracuff pressure of airway devices in children during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Onur Balaban; Mineto Kamata; Mumin Hakim; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Effect of Intravenous Hydrocortisone on Preventing Postoperative Sore Throat Followed by Laryngeal Mask Airway Use in patients Undergoing Urogenital Surgeries.

Authors:  Mahmood Eydi; Khosro Kolahdouzan; Samad Ej Golzari
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2013-03-13

6.  Comparison Between the Protector™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Endotracheal Tube for Minimally Invasive Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery.

Authors:  Georgios Kotsovolis; Ioannis Pliakos; Stavros Panidis; Dimitrios Gkinas; Theodosios Papavramidis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Lower intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway in the lateral and prone positions compared with that in the supine position.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yano; Takashi Imaizumi; Chiho Uneda; Ryosuke Nakayama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  [Continuous cuff pressure measurement during laryngeal mask anesthesia : An obligatory measure to avoid postoperative complications].

Authors:  M Hensel; T Güldenpfennig; A Schmidt; M Krumm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Does cuff pressure monitoring reduce postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events after LMA-ProSeal insertion? A parallel group randomised trial.

Authors:  R Vasanth Karthik; Priya Ranganathan; Atul P Kulkarni; Kailash S Sharma
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Comparison of Different Cuff Pressure Use with the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway on Haemodynamic Response, Seal Pressure and Postoperative Adverse Events: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Achmet Ali; Demet Altun; Nukhet Sivrikoz; Mesut Yornuk; Namigar Turgut; İbrahim Özkan Akıncı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.