Literature DB >> 10860518

Geophagy among primates: adaptive significance and ecological consequences.

.   

Abstract

We review geophagy, or soil ingestion, in primates. This behaviour is widespread and is presumed to be important to health and nutrition. Primates may engage in geophagy for one or a combination of reasons. Here we present, and make a preliminary assessment of, six nonexclusive hypotheses that may contribute to the prevalence of geophagy. Four hypotheses relate to geophagy in alleviating gastrointestinal disorders or upsets: (1) soils adsorb toxins such as phenolics and secondary metabolites; (2) soil ingestion has an antacid action and adjusts the gut pH; (3) soils act as an antidiarrhoeal agent; and (4) soils counteract the effects of endoparasites. Two hypotheses pertain to geophagy in supplementing minerals and/or elements: (5) soils supplement nutrient-poor diets and (6) soils provide extra iron at high altitudes. In addition to these hypotheses, geophagy may satiate olfactory senses, serve as a famine food and finally may have no function at all. We draw together a large body of information from various sources to assess these hypotheses and suggest some tests to understand the function of geophagy. Our review suggests that primates engage in geophagy for a number of reasons that are nonexclusive. We conclude that mineral supplementation, adsorption of toxins, treatment of diarrhoea and pH adjustment of the gut seem the most plausible reasons why primates engage in geophagy. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10860518     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  32 in total

1.  Understanding geophagy in animals: standard procedures for sampling soils.

Authors:  William C Mahaney; R Krishnamani
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Clay mineralogical and related characteristics of geophagic materials.

Authors:  M J Wilson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Geochemistry of mineral licks at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga, South Africa.

Authors:  J D Stephenson; A Mills; J J Eksteen; A V Milewski; J G Myburgh
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Association of pica with anemia and gastrointestinal distress among pregnant women in Zanzibar, Tanzania.

Authors:  Sera L Young; Sabra S Khalfan; Tamer H Farag; Justine A Kavle; Said M Ali; Hamad Hajji; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Gretel H Pelto; James M Tielsch; Rebecca J Stoltzfus
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Evaluation of the medicinal use of clay minerals as antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Lynda B Williams; Shelley E Haydel
Journal:  Int Geol Rev       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.958

6.  A meta-analysis of pica and micronutrient status.

Authors:  Diana Miao; Sera L Young; Christopher D Golden
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Geophagic earths consumed by women in western Kenya contain dangerous levels of lead, arsenic, and iron.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; Shalean M Collins; Moshood Omotayo; Stephanie L Martin; Katherine L Dickin; Sera L Young
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 8.  Impact of direct soil exposures from airborne dust and geophagy on human health.

Authors:  David Sing; Charles F Sing
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Effects of dietary sodium on performance, flight and compensation strategies in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Kai Xiao; Ke Shen; Jian-Feng Zhong; Guo-Qing Li
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Differences and commonalities in physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of Zanzibari geophagic soils.

Authors:  Sera L Young; M Jeffrey Wilson; Stephen Hillier; Evelyne Delbos; Said M Ali; Rebecca J Stoltzfus
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.