| Literature DB >> 20385025 |
Kai Xiao1, Ke Shen, Jian-Feng Zhong, Guo-Qing Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sodium is critical for many physiological functions in insects. Herbivorous insects should expend considerable energy to compensate for sodium deficiency due to low sodium concentration in most inland plants upon which they feed. However, sodium compensation behaviors such as mud-puddling have been observed in some species but not in others. We expect that there may be other sodium compensation strategies in insects. Here, we select a rarely mud-puddling insect species, the cotton boll worm, Helicoverpa armigera, and determine the effects of dietary sodium on performance and flight, and examine their means of sodium compensation.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20385025 PMCID: PMC2859862 DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Zool ISSN: 1742-9994 Impact factor: 3.172
A repeated-measures ANOVA for effect of diet and larvae age (days after hatching) on larvae body weight
| Diet | 2 | 21818.20 | 8.61 | 0.0003 |
| Error a | 188 | 2535.45 | ||
| Larvae age | 1.85 | 2957949.84 | 1167.02 | <0.0001 |
| Larvae age × Diet | 3.71 | 12545.52 | 4.95 | 0.0010 |
| Error b | 348.40 | 2534.63 |
Above statistical computations were performed by the program SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS for Windows xp; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). H. armigera larvae were fed on diet A, B and C. Diet A was a conventional diet. Diet B was modified from the conventional diet in which half amounts of NaCl and NaF in Wesson salt mixture were replaced with equal mole of KCl and KF, respectively. Diet C was modified from the conventional diet in which all NaCl and NaF in Wesson salt mixture were replaced with equal mole of KCl and KF.
The mean body weights of the H. armigera larvae feeding on diet A, B and C
| A | 21.1 ± 0.3 | 36.5 ± 1.2 | 85.8 ± 2.3 | 122.2 ± 5.4 d | 211.5 ± 9.6 B |
| B | 20.9 ± 0.4 | 35.7 ± 1.0 | 86.6 ± 2.0 | 134.6 ± 6.0 Cd | 226.3 ± 7.2 B |
| C | 21.8 ± 0.3 | 39.0 ± 1.2 | 98.4 ± 2.0 | 140.9 ± 5.0 C | 257.9 ± 8.1 A |
* Data are shown as Mean ± SE for 64 individuals. L7 to L11 represents 7 to 11 days after the larvae transferred to one of the three diets. Different capital or small letters after values indicate significant differences at P < 0.01 or at P < 0.05 among different treatments by a repeated measures ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT). See text and Table 1 for further explanations.
Figure 1Food consumption of 4. The larvae previously fed on diet C or A from 1st to 3rd instar, and then were transferred to diet A or C, respectively. Values represent the mean ± SEM and followed by the same small letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 compared by a 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA and Duncan's New Multiple Range Test. Numbers of replicates are shown inside the bars.
Influences of larval diets on the H. armigera adult emergence and body weight
| Larvae fed diet | Emergence percent* | Percent of moth with | Body weight (mg)* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | A | 83.5 ± 5.9 a | 8.3 ± 0.6 b | 141.4 ± 5.2 a |
| B | 86.2 ± 4.6 a | 10.5 ± 0.8 b | 133.9 ± 3.6 ab | |
| C | 84.3 ± 6.1 a | 14.5 ± 0.9 a | 126.5 ± 4.0 b | |
| Female | A | 84.1 ± 8.7 a | 9.5 ± 0.6 b | 158.6 ± 3.1 a |
| B | 84.8 ± 5.7 a | 11.1 ± 0.7 ab | 139.2 ± 5.5 b | |
| C | 84.9 ± 7.4 a | 14.5 ± 1.2 a | 138.0 ± 7.2 b |
* Data are shown as Mean ± SE for at least 10 individuals. Different small letters after values indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among different treatments by a one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT). See text and Table 1 for further explanations.
Effects of larval diets on flight capacities in the adults
| Larvae fed on diet | n | Flight speed (km.h-1) * | Flight duration (h) * | Flight distance (km) * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 30 | 2.51 ± 0.04 a | 9.96 ± 0.65 a | 26.61 ± 1.35 a |
| B | 28 | 2.44 ± 0.05 a | 10.91 ± 0.40 a | 26.01 ± 1.04 a |
| C | 33 | 2.32 ± 0.05 b | 10.82 ± 0.54 a | 24.93 ± 1.38 a |
* Data are shown as Mean ± SE. Different small letters after values indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among different treatments by a one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT). See text and Table 1 for further explanations.
Differences in total amounts of sugar and lipid (mg/g)in the moths from the larvae on diet A, B and C, and their variations before and after flight
| Larvae fed diet | Sugar* | Lipid* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before flight | After flight | Difference | Before flight | After flight | Difference | |
| A | 68.3 ± 4.5 b | 46.6 ± 3.4 b | 21.8 ± 1.5 a | 405.8 ± 30.5 b | 231.4 ± 26.8 a | 174.4 ± 14.4 b |
| B | 65.8 ± 4.9 ab | 41.8 ± 2.4 b | 24.0 ± 2.9 a | 478.6 ± 15.6 a | 255.7 ± 16.4 a | 222.9 ± 12.1 a |
| C | 78.0 ± 3.8 a | 52.1 ± 4.0 a | 26.2 ± 1.8 a | 430.8 ± 29.8 ab | 240.6 ± 18.6 a | 190.3 ± 11.3 a |
* Data are shown as Mean ± SE for 12-18 individuals. Different small letters after values indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among different treatments by a one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT). See text and Table 1 for further explanations.
Figure 2State-dependent changes in cannibalism incidence. A 5th-instar cannibal from diet A, B or C and a 5th-instar victim from diet A were housed together for 1 hour. * indicates statistically significant difference in cannibalism incidence between cannibals from diet C and those from diet A or B by a chi-square test.
Figure 3Victim-dependent changes in cannibalism incidence. A 5th-instar cannibal from diet C and a 5th-instar victim from diet A, B or C were housed together for 1 hour. * indicates statistically significant difference in cannibalism incidence between victims from diet A and those from diet B or C by a chi-square test.