| Literature DB >> 20617027 |
Abstract
Over evolutionary time humans have developed a complex biological relationship with soils. Here we describe modes of soil exposure and their biological implications. We consider two types of soil exposure, the first being the continuous exposure to airborne soil, and the second being dietary ingestion of soils, or geophagy. It may be assumed that airborne dust and ingestion of soil have influenced the evolution of particular DNA sequences which control biological systems that enable individual organisms to take advantage of, adapt to and/or protect against exposures to soil materials. We review the potential for soil exposure as an environmental source of epigenetic signals which may influence the function of our genome in determining health and disease.Entities:
Keywords: dust; epigenetics; genetics; geophagy; microbiome; soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20617027 PMCID: PMC2872320 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7031205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1.Global climactic systems of dust distribution: sources and trajectories.
Concentration of culturable bacteria and fungal spores in dust storms.
| Bacterial CFU m−3 | Fungal CFU m−3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Site | Dust Source | Background | Dust | Background | Dust |
| Kansas | Kansas | <10 | 2,880–42,735 | ND | ND |
| Junction, TX | Texas | <450 | >1,544 | NA | NA |
| Mali | Sahara/Sahil | 200–1,100 | 720–15,700 | 0–130 | 80–370 |
| Israel | Sahara | 79–108 | 694–995 | 31–115 | 205–226 |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | Sahara/Sahil | 0–100 | 90–350 | 0–60 | 30–60 |
| Korea | Gobi/Taklamakan | 105–1,930 | 225–8,212 | 100–8,510 | 336–6,992 |
CFU m−3 = Colony Forming Units per cubic meter of air
ND—No Data
NA—Not Applicable
Adapted from: Griffin, DW; Clincal Microbiology Reviews, v. 20 (3), 2007