Literature DB >> 9457019

Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.

J Ghafari1, F S Shofer, U Jacobsson-Hunt, D L Markowitz, L L Laster.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion in prepubertal children. Facial and occlusal changes after treatment with either a headgear or a Fränkel function regulator are reported. Molar and canine relationships, overjet, intermolar and intercanine distances were measured from casts taken every 2 months, and mounted on a SAM II articulator. Cephalometric radiographs were taken annually. The results indicate that both the headgear and function regulator were effective in correcting the malocclusion. A common mode of action of these appliances is the possibility to generate differential growth between the jaws. The extent and nature of this effect, as well as other skeletal and occlusal responses differ. Treatment in late childhood was as effective as that in midchildhood. This finding suggests that timing of treatment in developing malocclusions may be optimal in the late mixed dentition, thus avoiding a retention phase before a later stage of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. However, a number of conditions may dictate an earlier intervention in the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9457019     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70276-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  15 in total

1.  Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ciara Campbell; Declan Millett; Niamh Kelly; Marie Cooke; Michael Cronin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  E Erin Bilbo; Steven D Marshall; Karin A Southard; Verrasathpurush Allareddy; Nathan Holton; Allyn M Thames; Marlene S Otsby; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Surgical versus orthodontic correction for Class II patients: age and severity in treatment planning and treatment outcome.

Authors:  J F Tulloch; B E Lenz; C Phillips
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 0.970

4.  Correction of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with a mandibular protraction appliances and multiloop edgewise archwire technique.

Authors:  Benedito Freitas; Heloiza Freitas; Pedro César F Dos Santos; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Ritu Duggal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear.

Authors:  Sara Ramos Braga Santos; Telma Martins de Araújo; Carlos Jorge Vogel; Márcio Bastos de Oliveira; Marcos Alan Vieira Bittencourt; Emanuel Braga
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel' s functional regulator (1b).

Authors:  Juan-Jose Alió-Sanz; Carmen Iglesias-Conde; Jose Lorenzo-Pernía; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Asunción Mendoza-Mendoza; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-07-01

8.  Study of mandibular growth in patients treated with Fränkel's functional regulator (1b).

Authors:  Juan-Jose Alió-Sanz; Eyleen Kato; Jose Lorenzo-Pernía; Carmen Iglesias-Conde; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 9.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

10.  Treatment effects of R-appliance and anterior inclined bite plate in class II, division I malocclusion.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Shahin Emami Meybodi; Abdolreza Jamilian; Seyyed Amir Reza Fatahi Meybodi; Elham Morshedi Meybodi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.