Literature DB >> 10859779

Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk.

J K Lazo1, J C Kinnell, A Fisher.   

Abstract

This research examines and compares perceptions held by laypeople and ecologists about risks to ecosystems, particularly risk from global climate change (GCC). A survey elicited perceptions of 31 risk characteristics for 13 GCC and 12 non-GCC risks to ecosystems. Factor analysis was used to examine the structure of layperson and expert risk perceptions. Both experts and laypeople tend to perceive GCC risks to ecosystems as less avoidable and more acceptable than risks from other causes. Compared to laypeople's perceptions, though, experts perceived GCC risks to have slightly lower impacts, be less avoidable, more acceptable, and less understandable than non-GCC risks to ecosystems. These findings may help guide efforts to communicate with laypeople about ecological risks from climate change.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10859779     DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.202019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  13 in total

1.  Perceiving land-degrading activities from the lay perspective in northern China.

Authors:  Harry F Lee; David D Zhang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Social Perception of Public Water Supply Network and Groundwater Quality in an Urban Setting Facing Saltwater Intrusion and Water Shortages.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alameddine; Gheeda Jawhari; Mutasem El-Fadel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Perception-based analysis of climate change effect on forest-based livelihood: The case of Vhembe District in South Africa.

Authors:  Chidiebere Ofoegbu; Paxie W Chirwa; Joseph Francis; Folarannmi D Babalola
Journal:  Jamba       Date:  2016-07-29

4.  How do the Chinese perceive ecological risk in freshwater lakes?

Authors:  Lei Huang; Yuting Han; Ying Zhou; Heinz Gutscher; Jun Bi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Understanding the Links Between Climate Change Risk Perceptions and the Action Response to Inform Climate Services Interventions.

Authors:  Anna Steynor; Lorena Pasquini; Andrew Thatcher; Bruce Hewitson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.302

6.  Effects of news frames on perceived risk, emotions, and learning.

Authors:  Christine Otieno; Hans Spada; Alexander Renkl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty & regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Evidence for Public Health Risks of Wastewater and Excreta Management Practices in Southeast Asia: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Steven Lam; Hung Nguyen-Viet; Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh; Huong Nguyen-Mai; Sherilee Harper
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Expert risk perceptions and the social amplification of risk: A case study in invasive tree pests and diseases.

Authors:  Julie Urquhart; Clive Potter; Julie Barnett; John Fellenor; John Mumford; Christopher P Quine
Journal:  Environ Sci Policy       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.581

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.