Literature DB >> 10855883

Wound infection in hip and knee arthroplasty.

W J Gaine1, N A Ramamohan, N A Hussein, M G Hullin, S W McCreath.   

Abstract

We have studied prospectively the outcome of wound discharge in patients after arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Over a period of 3.5 years 530 primary arthroplasties were carried out in one hospital. Postoperative wound infections developed in 82. At a mean follow-up of two years a comparison was made between these patients and 82 with healthy wounds, in terms of symptoms and signs of deep infection. There was an incidence of 1.1% of early deep infection, within six weeks in all cases. The rate of 'superficial' infection was 17.3% in the hips, 10.5% in the knees and 14.3% in total. At a mean follow-up of 26 months, there were no significant differences between the patients with infected wounds and a matched group of patients with healthy wounds in terms of the ESR, level of C-reactive protein, white cell count and radiological scores, but clinical scores were significantly worse in the patients with infected knees (p < 0.05). The length of stay was also significantly longer in this group (mean 14.6 days in the healthy wound group, 19 days in the problem group; p < 0.005). There was, however, no convincing evidence that these wound infections led to deep infection and early revision in the early to medium follow-up period. A larger and longer prospective trial would be necessary to shed more light on this potential problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10855883     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b4.10305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  30 in total

Review 1.  Wound complications in total knee arthroplasty. Which flap is to be used? With or without retention of prosthesis?

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello; Marzia Salgarello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Optimising femoral component rotation using Equiflex instrumentation: a clinical review.

Authors:  Ranjith R Kuzhupilly; Ilias Seferiadis; Iain A C Lennox
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Antimicrobial Release From Prefabricated Spacers Is Variable and the Dose Is Low.

Authors:  Oren Goltzer; Alex McLaren; Derek Overstreet; Christopher Galli; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  B Lehner; D Witte; A J Suda; S Weiss
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange.

Authors:  Nitesh Gahlot; Raj Bahadur
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement.

Authors:  Matthias Wolf; Heimo Clar; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature.

Authors:  A Kornuijt; D Das; T Sijbesma; L de Vries; W van der Weegen
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

9.  Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Geir Hallan; Geir Hallan; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif I Havelin; Lars B Engesaeter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Soft-tissue Defects After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Management and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel A Osei; Kelsey A Rebehn; Martin I Boyer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.