Literature DB >> 10855346

Quality of life and quality adjusted survival for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

D L Fairclough1, J H Fetting, D Cella, W Wonson, C M Moinpour.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective was to compare health related quality of life (QOL) in hormone receptor negative, node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to determine whether a more intensive chemotherapy regimen has an adverse effect upon QOL that is not balanced by improvements in disease control or survival. Increased physical symptoms, including fatigue and the inconvenience of the dose intensive 16-week regimen, were expected to have a negative impact on QOL.
DESIGN: QOL was measured in 163 patients, randomized to either a standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-flurouracil (CAF) or a 16-week multidrug regimen, using the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ). The 30 item BCQ was self-administered prior to therapy, during therapy, and 4 months post treatment.
RESULTS: BCQ scores decreased (worsened) more during therapy on the 16-week regimen, median change -1.4, than on CAF, median change -0.8 (p < 0.001). By 4 months post treatment, BCQ scores were higher than pre-treatment and equal in the two arms (CAF: 8.1 and 16 weeks: 8.2, p = 0.6). Over a period of 48 months, patients on the 16-week regimen averaged 1.4 fewer months of treatment with toxicity, 4.0 more months without symptoms and 0.7 fewer months post recurrence compared to patients on the CAF regimen. Given typical values for these health states, the gain in Q-TWiST observed for the CAF regimen during treatment shifted to the 16-week regimen after 1 year, with a gain of 2.0 to 2.4 months after 4 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesized negative impact of the dose intensive 16-week regimen was confirmed by the BCQ assessments. However, Q-TWiST analysis suggests a small gain for the 16-week regimen. The later results should be interpreted with caution with the limited follow-up of 4 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10855346     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008806828316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  8 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: review and recommendations.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; P Feigl; B Metch; K A Hayden; F L Meyskens; J Crowley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  C Hürny; J Bernhard; A S Coates; M Castiglione-Gertsch; H F Peterson; R D Gelber; J F Forbes; C M Rudenstam; E Simoncini; D Crivellari; A Goldhirsch; H J Senn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparison of time-tradeoff utilities and rating scale values of cancer patients and their relatives: evidence for a possible plateau relationship.

Authors:  J F O'Leary; D L Fairclough; M K Jankowski; J C Weeks
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Quality-of-life-adjusted evaluation of adjuvant therapies for operable breast cancer. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; F Cavalli
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Quality of life in stage II breast cancer: an instrument for clinical trials.

Authors:  M N Levine; G H Guyatt; M Gent; S De Pauw; M D Goodyear; W M Hryniuk; A Arnold; B Findlay; J R Skillings; V H Bramwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Costs and benefits of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a quality-adjusted survival analysis.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; R J Simes; P Glasziou; A S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: an Intergroup study.

Authors:  J H Fetting; R Gray; D L Fairclough; T J Smith; K A Margolin; M L Citron; M Grove-Conrad; D Cella; K Pandya; N Robert; I C Henderson; C K Osborne; M D Abeloff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 44.544

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life after chemotherapy cycle in breast cancer in Iran.

Authors:  Peivand Bastani; Aliasghar Ahmad Kiadaliri
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  The impact of an expressive writing intervention on quality of life among Chinese breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qian Lu; Lu Dong; Ivan H C Wu; Jin You; Jialing Huang; Yan Hu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Fatigued breast cancer survivors: the role of sleep quality, depressed mood, stage and age.

Authors:  Rajni Banthia; Vanessa L Malcarne; Celine M Ko; James W Varni; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-10

4.  Chemotherapy interruptions in relation to symptom severity in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Gwen Wyatt; Alla Sikorskii; Irena Tesnjak; David Victorson; Gordan Srkalovic
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Efficacy of progressive muscle relaxation training and guided imagery in reducing chemotherapy side effects in patients with breast cancer and in improving their quality of life.

Authors:  Hee J Yoo; Se H Ahn; Sung B Kim; Woo K Kim; Oh S Han
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-04-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; David Feeny; Timothy L Hunt; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Outcomes research in cancer clinical trial cooperative groups: the RTOG model.

Authors:  D W Bruner; B Movsas; A Konski; M Roach; M Bondy; C Scarintino; C Scott; W Curran
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Quality of life valuations of mammography screening.

Authors:  Amy E Bonomi; Denise M Boudreau; Paul A Fishman; Evette Ludman; Amy Mohelnitzky; Elizabeth A Cannon; Deb Seger
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Exercise and quality of life during and after treatment for breast cancer: results of two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lisa A Cadmus; Peter Salovey; Herbert Yu; Gina Chung; Stanislav Kasl; Melinda L Irwin
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  A quality-adjusted survival analysis (Q-TWiST) of rituximab plus CVP vs CVP alone in first-line treatment of advanced follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  R Marcus; R Aultman; F Jost
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.