Literature DB >> 2003707

Quality-of-life-adjusted evaluation of adjuvant therapies for operable breast cancer. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

R D Gelber1, A Goldhirsch, F Cavalli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a single cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with longer duration chemotherapy for premenopausal women or chemoendocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer using a quality-of-life-oriented end point, Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted analysis of TWiST: Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity).
DESIGN: Multicenter randomized clinical trial--International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG: formerly Ludwig Group) Trial V.
SETTING: IBCSG participating centers in Sweden, Switzerland, Australia, Yugoslavia, Spain, New Zealand, Italy, Germany, and South Africa. PATIENTS: Data were available for 1229 eligible patients with node-positive breast cancer who were randomized to receive one of three adjuvant treatments after at least a total mastectomy and axillary clearance.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and leucovorin; or six cycles (6 months) of a conventionally timed chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and prednisone for premenopausal women or this combination plus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women; or both perioperative and conventionally timed chemotherapy for a 7-month course of adjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: At 5 years of median follow-up, patients who received the longer duration therapies had an improved 5-year disease-free survival percentage (53% compared with 36%; P less than 0.001) and 5-year overall survival percentage (73% compared with 63%; P = 0.001) compared with those who received the single perioperative cycle alone. By 3.5 years, the greater burden of toxic effects associated with the longer duration treatments was balanced by their superior control of disease. Within 5 years of follow-up, even after subtracting time with adjuvant treatment toxicity, patients gained an average of 2.2 months of Q-TWiST if treated with the longer duration therapies compared with the single cycle (P = 0.03). The gain for premenopausal patients was 2.8 months (P = 0.05), whereas the gain for postmenopausal women was 1.5 months (P greater than 0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Six or seven months of adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoendocrine therapy improve both the quantity and quality of life for patients with node-positive breast cancer compared with a single short course of perioperative combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2003707     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  38 in total

Review 1.  Selecting a decision model for economic evaluation: a case study and review.

Authors:  J Karnon; J Brown
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1998-10

2.  Economic analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  G H Lyman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression.

Authors:  L Cooper-Patrick; N R Powe; M W Jenckes; J J Gonzales; D M Levine; D E Ford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Quality of life: philosophical question or clinical reality?

Authors:  M L Slevin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

5.  Adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: the overview.

Authors:  R D Gelber; A S Coates; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-04

Review 6.  Heath-related quality of life in Spanish breast cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  María Concepción Delgado-Sanz; María José García-Mendizábal; Marina Pollán; Maria João Forjaz; Gonzalo López-Abente; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Evaluating the quality of life associated with rifabutin prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex in persons with AIDS: combining Q-TWiST and multiattribute utility techniques.

Authors:  D A Revicki; K N Simpson; A W Wu; R L LaVallee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Measurement accuracy in assessing patient's quality of life: to weight or not to weight domains of quality of life.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Thomas V Merluzzi; Amy Peterman; Lisa B Cronk
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Methods and problems in measuring quality of life.

Authors:  D F Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.