Literature DB >> 10854454

Dealing with competing and conflicting risks in cancer communication.

M W Kreuter1.   

Abstract

Applied research on cancer risk communication is sparse, and even less is known about effective communication under conditions of multiple risks. This paper briefly describes the need and rationale for cancer risk communication, then describes what is known and needs to be known about communication addressing multiple risks. Its focus is on two specific communication issues: 1) comparing different risks and 2) prioritizing between multiple risks. There is considerable unmet need in cancer risk communication for new knowledge and recommendations for best practices. Those professionals choosing to pursue this work can make a significant contribution to the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10854454     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  13 in total

1.  A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Lori A Bastian; Susan Halabi; Laura Fish; Isaac M Lipkus; Hayden B Bosworth; Barbara K Rimer; Ilene C Siegler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Media messages about cancer: what do people understand?

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Josephine Calvi; Rebecca Cowan; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Sarah M Greene; Laura Saccoccio; Erica Cove; Douglas Roblin; Andrew Williams
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

3.  Risky communication: pitfalls in counseling about risk, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  K O'Doherty; G K Suthers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Erin K Tagai; Kuang-Yi Wen; Minsun Lee; Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Deirdre Kurtz; John Scarpato; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-01-31

5.  Cognitive and Affective Perceptions of Vulnerability as Predictors of Exercise Intentions among People with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Annette R Kaufman; William M P Klein; Todd A Doyle; Mary de Groot
Journal:  J Risk Res       Date:  2014-01-01

6.  Results of a randomized trial testing messages tailored to participant-selected topics among female college students: physical activity outcomes.

Authors:  Lisa M Quintiliani; Marci K Campbell; J Michael Bowling; Susan Steck; Pamela S Haines; Brenda M DeVellis
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2010-07

7.  Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  P Adab; T Marshall; A Rouse; B Randhawa; H Sangha; N Bhangoo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Elizabeth Fries; Donna McClish; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

9.  Screening in the dark: ethical considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when evidence is insufficient to support screening populations.

Authors:  Ingrid M Burger; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion; Linda L Scott; Honghong Zhou; Patrick Monahan; Yan Ding; Patrick Loehrer; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.