Literature DB >> 20683094

Results of a randomized trial testing messages tailored to participant-selected topics among female college students: physical activity outcomes.

Lisa M Quintiliani1, Marci K Campbell, J Michael Bowling, Susan Steck, Pamela S Haines, Brenda M DeVellis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of identifying tailoring variables would improve message design. Tailoring to a behavior that a participant selects as one they would like to work on may increase message relevance, and thus effectiveness. This trial compared 3 groups: message tailored to physical activity as a participant-selected topic (choice), message tailored to physical activity as an expert-determined topic (expert), or nontailored message (comparison).
METHODS: 408 female college students received web-delivered computer-tailored messages on physical activity. Outcomes were immediate and 1-month follow-up changes in psychosocial, goal-related, and behavioral variables related to physical activity.
RESULTS: Participants were predominately non-Hispanic White (73.8%). Change in self-efficacy and goal commitment at immediate follow-up and vigorous physical activity at 1-month follow-up was greater in the expert versus comparison group. Change in goal commitment at immediate follow-up was lower in the choice versus expert group. In the expert group, those choosing physical activity as their selected topic perceived the goal to be easier at immediate follow-up compared with those receiving unmatched messages.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported tailoring to an expert-determined topic. However, based on the beneficial change in perceived goal difficulty when topics matched, future research should encourage synchrony between participant-selected topics and expert recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683094      PMCID: PMC4862359          DOI: 10.1123/jpah.7.4.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  21 in total

1.  American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: Reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity.

Authors:  Tim Byers; Marion Nestle; Anne McTiernan; Colleen Doyle; Alexis Currie-Williams; Ted Gansler; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Evaluation of motivationally tailored vs. standard self-help physical activity interventions at the workplace.

Authors:  B H Marcus; K M Emmons; L R Simkin-Silverman; L A Linnan; E R Taylor; B C Bock; M B Roberts; J S Rossi; D B Abrams
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

3.  The positive effect on determinants of physical activity of a tailored, general practice-based physical activity intervention.

Authors:  E M F Van Sluijs; M N M Van Poppel; J W R Twisk; J Brug; W Van Mechelen
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2004-10-12

Review 4.  A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors.

Authors:  Willemieke Kroeze; Andrea Werkman; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-06

Review 5.  Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature.

Authors:  Corneel Vandelanotte; Kym M Spathonis; Elizabeth G Eakin; Neville Owen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women.

Authors:  Marci Kramish Campbell; Irene Tessaro; Brenda DeVellis; Salli Benedict; Kristine Kelsey; Leigh Belton; Antonio Sanhueza
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

8.  Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Risk Index Working Group, Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  G A Colditz; K A Atwood; K Emmons; R R Monson; W C Willett; D Trichopoulos; D J Hunter
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Reliability and validity of the instrument used in BRFSS to assess physical activity.

Authors:  Michelle M Yore; Sandra A Ham; Barbara E Ainsworth; Judy Kruger; Jared P Reis; Harold W Kohl; Caroline A Macera
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.

Authors:  M K Campbell; B M DeVellis; V J Strecher; A S Ammerman; R F DeVellis; R S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  7 in total

1.  A pilot study on the effects of individually tailored education for MMR vaccine-hesitant parents on MMR vaccination intention.

Authors:  Charitha Gowda; Sarah E Schaffer; Kristin Kopec; Arielle Markel; Amanda F Dempsey
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update.

Authors:  Karen Broekhuizen; Willemieke Kroeze; Mireille N M van Poppel; Anke Oenema; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-10

3.  Electronic Health Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities After General Surgical and Gynecological Procedures: Intervention Mapping as a Useful Method for Further Development.

Authors:  Chantal M den Bakker; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Eva van der Meij; Wilhelmus Jhj Meijerink; Baukje van den Heuvel; Astrid H Baan; Paul Hp Davids; Petrus C Scholten; Suzan van der Meij; W Marchien van Baal; Annette D van Dalsen; Daniel J Lips; Jan Willem van der Steeg; Wouter Kg Leclercq; Peggy Maj Geomini; Esther Cj Consten; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steve Mm de Castro; Paul Jm van Kesteren; Huib A Cense; Hein Bac Stockmann; A Dorien Ten Cate; Hendrik J Bonjer; Judith Af Huirne; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Predictors of Self-Determined Module Choice in a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Diet and Physical Activity Intervention: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Juul M J Coumans; Catherine A W Bolman; Anke Oenema; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  eHealth program to empower patients in returning to normal activities and work after gynecological surgery: intervention mapping as a useful method for development.

Authors:  Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Carina A Pittens; Willem van Mechelen; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Impact of physical activity intervention programs on self-efficacy in youths: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosa Cataldo; Janice John; Latha Chandran; Susmita Pati; A Laurie W Shroyer
Journal:  ISRN Obes       Date:  2013-02-07

Review 7.  Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging.

Authors:  Chloë Williamson; Graham Baker; Nanette Mutrie; Ailsa Niven; Paul Kelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.457

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.