Literature DB >> 10848564

Manual tracking in two dimensions.

K C Engel1, J F Soechting.   

Abstract

Manual tracking was studied by asking subjects to follow, with their finger, a target moving on a touch-sensitive video monitor. The target initially moved in a straight line at a constant speed and then, at a random point in time, made one abrupt change in direction. The results were approximated with a simple model according to which, after a reaction time, the hand moved in a straight line to intercept the target. Both the direction of hand motion and its peak speed could be predicted by assuming a constant time to intercept. This simple model was able to account for results obtained over a broad range of target speeds as well as the results of experiments in which both the speed and the direction of the target changed simultaneously. The results of an experiment in which the target acceleration was nonzero suggested that the error signals used during tracking are related to both speed and direction but poorly (if at all) to target acceleration. Finally, in an experiment in which target velocity remained constant along one axis but the perpendicular component underwent a step change, tracking along both axes was perturbed. This last finding demonstrates that tracking in two dimensions cannot be decomposed into its Cartesian components. However, an analytical model in a hand-centered frame of reference in which speed and direction are the controlled variables could account for much of the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10848564     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.6.3483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Interception of targets using brief directional cues.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Smooth pursuit tracking of an abrupt change in target direction: vector superposition of discrete responses.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Manual tracking in three dimensions.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; C C A M Gielen; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor synergies during manual tracking differ between familiar and unfamiliar trajectories.

Authors:  Bence J Borbély; Andreas Straube; Thomas Eggert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Representation of limb kinematics in Purkinje cell simple spike discharge is conserved across multiple tasks.

Authors:  Angela L Hewitt; Laurentiu S Popa; Siavash Pasalar; Claudia M Hendrix; Timothy J Ebner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.