Literature DB >> 27994330

A Prospective Study in Comparison of Ambulatory Phlebectomy and Duplex Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in the Management of Varicosities with Isolated Perforator Incompetence.

R Kishore1, T Bavani Sankar2, A Anandi2, S Nedunchezhian2, Valarmathy Murugan2.   

Abstract

Perforators are those which connect the superficial and deep venous system either directly to main veins or indirectly through the muscular and soleal venous plexus. The emergence of minimally invasive techniques like ambulatory phlebectomy (AP) and foam sclerotherapy (FS) has led to increasing interest about the appropriate therapy for the treatment of isolated perforator incompetence. There have been no studies which have compared the effectiveness of these in-office procedures in isolated perforator incompetence due to the low prevalence of cases. The primary goal of this study is to compare the clinical parameters (return to normal activity, primary symptom relief), functional parameters (procedure time, change in disease severity, course of venous ulcer), and duplex parameters (recurrence in treated veins, complete occlusion of treated veins) in the management of leg varicosities having isolated primary perforator incompetence by ambulatory phlebectomy and duplex guided foam sclerotherapy. Though the procedure time was shorter with FS than AP, the other parameters of primary symptom relief such as change in disease severity, faster healing of venous ulcer, complete occlusion of treated veins in follow-up duplex examination, and lower recurrence of treated veins are better with AP than FS. In conclusion, the interruption of perforators is effective in decreasing the symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency and for the rapid healing of ulcers. The interruption of the incompetent perforating veins appears to be essential to decrease ambulatory venous hypertension. It is apparent from this study that ambulatory phlebectomy stands distinct with enormous benefits and serves as a superior alternative to foam sclerotherapy in treating patients with isolated perforator incompetence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory phlebectomy; Compression therapy; Foam sclerotherapy; Isolated perforator incompetence

Year:  2016        PMID: 27994330      PMCID: PMC5127982          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-016-1481-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  14 in total

1.  Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessment.

Authors:  R B Rutherford; F T Padberg; A J Comerota; R L Kistner; M H Meissner; G L Moneta
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Efficacy of subfascial endoscopy in eradicating perforating veins of the lower leg and its relation with venous ulcer healing.

Authors:  E G Pierik; H van Urk; C H Wittens
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects.

Authors:  Hugo Partsch; Michael Clark; Giovanni Mosti; Erik Steinlechner; Jan Schuren; Martin Abel; Jean-Patrick Benigni; Philip Coleridge-Smith; Andre Cornu-Thénard; Mieke Flour; Jerry Hutchinson; John Gamble; Karin Issberner; Michael Juenger; Christine Moffatt; H A M Neumann; Eberhard Rabe; Jean F Uhl; Steven Zimmet
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 4.  The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; John R Pfeifer; Jennifer S Engle; David Schottenfeld
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Subfascial perforator vein ablation: comparison of open versus endoscopic techniques.

Authors:  D T Sato; C D Goff; R T Gregory; B F Walter; R G Gayle; F N Parent; R J DeMasi; G H Meier; J R Wheeler
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1999-05

6.  Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration: a randomized trial.

Authors:  E G Pierik; H van Urk; W C Hop; C H Wittens
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement.

Authors:  Bo Eklöf; Robert B Rutherford; John J Bergan; Patrick H Carpentier; Peter Gloviczki; Robert L Kistner; Mark H Meissner; Gregory L Moneta; Kenneth Myers; Frank T Padberg; Michel Perrin; C Vaughan Ruckley; Philip Coleridge Smith; Thomas W Wakefield
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Mid-term results of endoscopic perforator vein interruption for chronic venous insufficiency: lessons learned from the North American subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery registry. The North American Study Group.

Authors:  P Gloviczki; J J Bergan; J M Rhodes; L G Canton; S Harmsen; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Relation between postphlebitic changes in the deep veins and results of surgical treatment of venous ulcers.

Authors:  K Burnand; M L Thomas; T O'Donnell; N L Browse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins.

Authors:  Nicos Labropoulos; Jay Tiongson; Landon Pryor; Apostolos K Tassiopoulos; Steven S Kang; M Ashraf Mansour; William H Baker
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  1 in total

1.  Age is not a barrier to good outcomes following ambulatory high ligation and stripping for varicose veins: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  ChuWen Chen; YuTing Cai; XiaoQing Long; Xiang Fan; Ding Yuan; Yi Yang; Bin Huang; JiChun Zhao; YuKui Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.