BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence rate of colonic polyps or masses 1 cm or greater in diameter in patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms, from diverse practice settings, using a national endoscopic database. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were included based on procedure indication. Endoscopic data were generated with a computer database at each practice site, transmitted to a central data bank and merged with data from multiple sites for analysis. Group 1 patients had nonspecific abdominal symptoms, which were defined as pain, constipation and diarrhea. Group 2 patients had a positive fecal occult blood test. Group 3 patients were asymptomatic, undergoing screening colonoscopy. Serious colon pathology was defined as a polyp or mass greater than 9 mm in size. RESULTS: Data were collected from 31 practice sites in 21 states during a period of 18 months. Of the 20,745 colonoscopy examinations, 9.2% were performed to evaluate patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms, excluding other indications. Among patients with nonspecific symptoms 7.27% had polyp(s) 1 cm or greater in diameter compared with 17.05% of patients with positive fecal occult blood test (odds ratio 2.12: CI [1.73, 2.60]; p < 0.001). Patients with nonspecific symptoms had similar rates of large polyps as asymptomatic patients (7.27% vs. 6.45%, p = 0.32). Multivariate analysis identified several independent variables including increasing age, male gender and practice site at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. CONCLUSIONS: In diverse, practice-based settings, patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms who are referred for colonoscopy do not have a higher risk of serious colonic pathology than asymptomatic patients.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence rate of colonic polyps or masses 1 cm or greater in diameter in patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms, from diverse practice settings, using a national endoscopic database. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were included based on procedure indication. Endoscopic data were generated with a computer database at each practice site, transmitted to a central data bank and merged with data from multiple sites for analysis. Group 1 patients had nonspecific abdominal symptoms, which were defined as pain, constipation and diarrhea. Group 2 patients had a positive fecal occult blood test. Group 3 patients were asymptomatic, undergoing screening colonoscopy. Serious colon pathology was defined as a polyp or mass greater than 9 mm in size. RESULTS: Data were collected from 31 practice sites in 21 states during a period of 18 months. Of the 20,745 colonoscopy examinations, 9.2% were performed to evaluate patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms, excluding other indications. Among patients with nonspecific symptoms 7.27% had polyp(s) 1 cm or greater in diameter compared with 17.05% of patients with positive fecal occult blood test (odds ratio 2.12: CI [1.73, 2.60]; p < 0.001). Patients with nonspecific symptoms had similar rates of large polyps as asymptomatic patients (7.27% vs. 6.45%, p = 0.32). Multivariate analysis identified several independent variables including increasing age, male gender and practice site at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. CONCLUSIONS: In diverse, practice-based settings, patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms who are referred for colonoscopy do not have a higher risk of serious colonic pathology than asymptomatic patients.
Authors: Deborah A Fisher; Leah L Zullig; Steven C Grambow; David H Abbott; Robert S Sandler; Robert H Fletcher; Hashem B El-Serag; Dawn Provenzale Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Douglas K Rex; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Yu-Xiao Yang; Laurel A Habel; Angela M Capra; Ninah S Achacoso; Charles P Quesenberry; Assiamira Ferrara; Theodore R Levin; James D Lewis Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-10-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Amit G Singal; Samir Gupta; Jeffrey Lee; Ethan A Halm; Carolyn M Rutter; Douglas Corley; John Inadomi Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste; Mike E Craanen; Rene W M van der Hulst; Joep F Bartelsman; Dick P Bezemer; Kim R Cappendijk; Gerrit A Meijer; Linde M Morsink; Pleun Snel; Hans A R E Tuynman; Roy L J van Wanrooy; Eric I C Wesdorp; Chris J J Mulder Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Bernard Denis; Marcel Ruetsch; Patrick Strentz; Jean Yves Vogel; Francis Guth; Jean Marc Boyaval; Xavier Pagnon; Jean François Ebelin; Isabelle Gendre; Philippe Perrin Journal: Gut Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 23.059