Literature DB >> 10835113

CT evaluation of prosthetic ossicular reconstruction procedures: what the otologist needs to know.

J A Stone1, S K Mukherji, B S Jewett, V N Carrasco, M Castillo.   

Abstract

Postoperative otologic evaluation of patients who have undergone ossicular reconstruction is often difficult. However, thin-section computed tomography (CT) can help determine the type of prosthesis used for reconstruction and adequately assess for complications that may be causing postoperative conductive hearing loss. A variety of prostheses may be used in ossicular reconstruction (eg, stapes prosthesis, incus interposition graft, Applebaum prosthesis, Black oval-top prosthesis, Richards centered prosthesis, Goldenberg prosthesis) and can usually be identified at CT by their shapes and locations. Several causes of prosthetic failure are readily demonstrated at CT, including recurrent cholesteatoma and otitis media, formation of granulation tissue or adhesions, and various mechanical problems (eg, subluxation, dislocation, extrusion, fracture, bending). Perilymphatic fistula can be difficult to identify at CT but may be suggested by the presence of pneumolabyrinth, unexplained middle ear effusion, or fluid accumulation within the mastoid air cells. The presence of soft tissue within the oval window niche 4-6 weeks following surgery may indicate poststapedectomy granuloma or fibrosis. Familiarity with the normal and abnormal CT appearances of ossicular prostheses will enable the radiologist to assist the otologist in identifying patients in whom revision surgery is most appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10835113     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma03593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  Controlling the position and the dislocation of the middle ear transducer with high-resolution computed tomography and digital volume tomography: implications for the transducers' design.

Authors:  Georgios Kontorinis; Anja M Giesemann; Thomas Witt; Friedrich Goetz; Burkard Schwab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Imaging of the postoperative middle ear.

Authors:  Marc T Williams; Denis Ayache
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Rotational tomography of the normal and reconstructed middle ear in temporal bones: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ch Offergeld; J Kromeier; A Aschendorff; W Maier; Th Klenzner; Th Beleites; Th Zahnert; J Schipper; R Laszig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications.

Authors:  Christian Offergeld; Jan Kromeier; Saumil N Merchant; Nicoloz Lasurashvili; Marcus Neudert; Matthias Bornitz; Roland Laszig; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  [Significance of computed tomography evaluation before revision stapes surgery].

Authors:  C Röösli; A Hoffmann; T Treumann; T E Linder
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Resolution of Persistent Post-Stapedotomy Vertigo With Migraine Prophylactic Medication.

Authors:  Omid Moshtaghi; Hossein Mahboubi; Yarah M Haidar; Ronald Sahyouni; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Tympanoplasty - news and new perspectives.

Authors:  Marcus Neudert; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

8.  Intravestibular Stapes Prosthesis Protrusion Causing Post Stapedectomy Vertigo.

Authors:  J P Toirkens; W P A Kelders
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.