Literature DB >> 10831903

Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification: foldable acrylic versus poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses.

F H Oner1, U Gunenc, S T Ferliel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effects of foldable acrylic and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on posterior capsule opacification (PCO).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
METHODS: This consecutive series comprised 157 eyes having phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable acrylic IOL with rectangular optic edges and a 5.5 mm optic (AcrySof) (n = 80 eyes) or a PMMA IOL with rounded optic edges and 5.5 mm optic (n = 77). Evaluated were incidence, location, and degree of PCO. Mean postoperative follow-up was 17.8 months +/- 1.7 (SD) (range 16 to 22 months).
RESULTS: Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 8.7% of eyes in the foldable acrylic IOL group and in 24.7% of eyes in the PMMA IOL group. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < .01). Centrally located PCO was significantly lower in the acrylic group (P < .01). There were 3 eyes with severe PCO in the PMMA group and none in the acrylic group. Anterior capsule contraction and fibrosis were present in 4 eyes in the PMMA group but none in the acrylic group. Soemmering's ring cataract formation was detected in 3 eyes, all with the AcrySof IOL.
CONCLUSION: In addition to its optic material and rectangular optic edges, the AcrySof IOL provides additional advantages in lowering the incidence of PCO compared with rounded-edge PMMA IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831903     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00456-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Influence of glistenings on the optical quality of acrylic foldable intraocular lens.

Authors:  T Oshika; Y Shiokawa; S Amano; K Mitomo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Systems of analysis of posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  T M Aslam; B Dhillon; N Werghi; A Taguri; A Wadood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sophie Maedel; Jennifer R Evans; Annette Harrer-Seely; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-16

4.  A prospective, randomised comparison of single and three piece acrylic foldable intraocular lenses.

Authors:  R Nejima; K Miyata; M Honbou; T Tokunaga; T Tanabe; M Sato; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Hydrophobic acrylic versus heparin surface-modified polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens: a biocompatibility study.

Authors:  Daniele Tognetto; Lisa Toto; Daniela Minutola; Enzo Ballone; Marta Di Nicola; Rocco Di Mascio; Giuseppe Ravalico
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Biomaterial Influence on Intraocular Lens Performance: An Overview.

Authors:  Cari Pérez-Vives
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Refractive Lens Exchange Combined with Primary Posterior Vitrectorhexis in Highly Myopic Patients.

Authors:  Tarek A Mohamed; Wael Soliman; Dalia M El Sebaity; Ahmed M Fathalla
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.