Literature DB >> 10831444

Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying.

G E Gardiner1, E O'Sullivan, J Kelly, M A Auty, G F Fitzgerald, J K Collins, R P Ross, C Stanton.   

Abstract

Spray drying of skim milk was evaluated as a means of preserving Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 and Lactobacillus salivarius UCC 118, which are human-derived strains with probiotic potential. Our initial experiments revealed that NFBC 338 is considerably more heat resistant in 20% (wt/vol) skim milk than UCC 118 is; the comparable decimal reduction times were 11.1 and 1.1 min, respectively, at 59 degrees C. An air outlet temperature of 80 to 85 degrees C was optimal for spray drying; these conditions resulted in powders with moisture contents of 4.1 to 4.2% and viable counts of 3.2 x 10(9) CFU/g for NFBC 338 and 5.2 x 10(7) CFU/g for UCC 118. Thus, L. paracasei NFBC 338 survived better than L. salivarius UCC 118 during spray drying; similar results were obtained when we used confocal scanning laser microscopy and LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability staining. In addition, confocal scanning laser microscopy revealed that the probiotic lactobacilli were located primarily in the powder particles. Although both spray-dried cultures appeared to be stressed, as shown by increased sensitivity to NaCl, bacteriocin production by UCC 118 was not affected by the process, nor was the activity of the bacteriocin peptide. The level of survival of NFBC 338 remained constant at approximately 1 x 10(9) CFU/g during 2 months of powder storage at 4 degrees C, while a decline in the level of survival of approximately 1 log (from 7.2 x 10(7) to 9.5 x 10(6) CFU/g) was observed for UCC 118 stored under the same conditions. However, survival of both Lactobacillus strains during powder storage was inversely related to the storage temperature. Our data demonstrate that spray drying may be a cost-effective way to produce large quantities of some probiotic cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831444      PMCID: PMC110587          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2605-2612.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  Influence of Storage at Freezing and Subsequent Refrigeration Temperatures on beta-Galactosidase Activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Authors:  S E Gilliland; R C Lara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Probiotics.

Authors:  F Guarner; G J Schaafsma
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Thermotolerance of meat spoilage lactic acid bacteria and their inactivation in vacuum-packaged vienna sausages.

Authors:  C M Franz; A von Holy
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Development of a probiotic cheddar cheese containing human-derived Lactobacillus paracasei strains.

Authors:  G Gardiner; R P Ross; J K Collins; G Fitzgerald; C Stanton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Probiotics: from myth to reality. Demonstration of functionality in animal models of disease and in human clinical trials.

Authors:  C Dunne; L Murphy; S Flynn; L O'Mahony; S O'Halloran; M Feeney; D Morrissey; G Thornton; G Fitzgerald; C Daly; B Kiely; E M Quigley; G C O'Sullivan; F Shanahan; J K Collins
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1999 Jul-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Development of a lacticin 3147-enriched whey powder with inhibitory activity against foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  S M Morgan; M Galvin; J Kelly; R P Ross; C Hill
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Identification of sites of injury in Lactobacillus bulgaricus during heat stress.

Authors:  P Teixeira; H Castro; C Mohácsi-Farkas; R Kirby
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Spray-drying of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  G Mauriello; M Aponte; R Andolfi; G Moschetti; F Villani
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  Identification and classification of Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. gasseri and L. johnsonii strains by SDS-PAGE and rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe hybridization.

Authors:  B Pot; C Hertel; W Ludwig; P Descheemaeker; K Kersters; K H Schleifer
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1993-03

10.  The ability of probiotic bacteria to bind to human intestinal mucus.

Authors:  P V Kirjavainen; A C Ouwehand; E Isolauri; S J Salminen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

  10 in total
  40 in total

1.  Direct in situ viability assessment of bacteria in probiotic dairy products using viability staining in conjunction with confocal scanning laser microscopy.

Authors:  M A Auty; G E Gardiner; S J McBrearty; E O O'Sullivan; D M Mulvihill; J K Collins; G F Fitzgerald; C Stanton; R P Ross
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: is it all gut flora modulation?

Authors:  S Ghosh; D van Heel; R J Playford
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Anhydrobiosis in bacteria: from physiology to applications.

Authors:  Armando Hernández García
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Technology and potential applications of probiotic encapsulation in fermented milk products.

Authors:  Siavash Iravani; Hassan Korbekandi; Seyed Vahid Mirmohammadi
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  Enhanced survival of GroESL-overproducing Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 under stressful conditions induced by drying.

Authors:  B M Corcoran; R P Ross; G F Fitzgerald; P Dockery; C Stanton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Diversity in robustness of Lactococcus lactis strains during heat stress, oxidative stress, and spray drying stress.

Authors:  Annereinou R Dijkstra; Meily C Setyawati; Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Wynand Alkema; Sacha A F T van Hijum; Peter A Bron; Jeroen Hugenholtz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of antibacterial effects between antimicrobial peptide and bacteriocins isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum on three common pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Liu Ming; Qian Zhang; Le Yang; Jian-An Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Sensitive quantitative detection of commensal bacteria by rRNA-targeted reverse transcription-PCR.

Authors:  Kazunori Matsuda; Hirokazu Tsuji; Takashi Asahara; Yukiko Kado; Koji Nomoto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Adaptation of Lactobacillus acidophilus to Thermal Stress Yields a Thermotolerant Variant Which Also Exhibits Improved Survival at pH 2.

Authors:  Sonia Kulkarni; Saiful F Haq; Shalaka Samant; Sunilkumar Sukumaran
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Association of beta-glucan endogenous production with increased stress tolerance of intestinal lactobacilli.

Authors:  Helena M Stack; Niamh Kearney; Catherine Stanton; Gerald F Fitzgerald; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.