Literature DB >> 10826455

Women's understanding of the mammography screening debate.

S Woloshin1, L M Schwartz, S J Byram, H C Sox, B Fischhoff, H G Welch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fractious public debate over mammography screening recommendations for women aged 40 to 49 years has received extensive attention in medical journals and in the press.
OBJECTIVE: To learn how women interpret the mammography screening debate.
METHODS: We mailed a survey to a random sample of American women 18 years and older, oversampling women of screening age (40-70 years). Sixty-six percent of women completed the survey (n = 503). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were women's reactions to the debate, their suggestion for the starting age for mammography screening, and their understanding of the source of the debate.
RESULTS: Almost all women (95%) said that they had paid some attention to the recent discussion about mammography screening. Only 24% said the discussion had improved their understanding of mammography, while 50% reported being upset by the public disagreement among screening experts. Women's beliefs about mammography differed from those articulated by experts in the debate. Eighty-three percent believed that mammography had proven benefit for women aged 40 to 49 years, and 38% believed that benefit was proven for women younger than 40 years. Most women suggested that mammography screening should begin before age 40 years, while only 5% suggested a first mammogram should be performed at 50 years or older. In response to an open-ended question about why mammography has been controversial, 15% cited concerns about the potential harms of radiation and another 12% cited questions about efficacy. Nearly half (49%), however, identified costs as the major source of debate (eg, "Health maintenance organizations [HMOs] don't want to pay for mammography").
CONCLUSIONS: Most women paid attention to the recent debate about routine mammography screening for women aged 40 to 49 years, but many believed the debate was about money rather than the question of benefit. Policy makers issuing recommendations about implementation of large-scale mammography screening services need to consider how to effectively disseminate their message.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10826455     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.10.1434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  22 in total

1.  Screening and litigation. The rate of interval cancers is too high.

Authors:  J R Benson; A D Purushotham; R Warren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

2.  Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Andrea C Dunlavy; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

3.  Communicating scientific uncertainty.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Alex L Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

5.  Fatalism and exposure to health information from the media: examining the evidence for causal influence.

Authors:  Steven Ramondt; A Susana Ramírez
Journal:  Ann Int Commun Assoc       Date:  2017-10-19

6.  Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma.

Authors:  E Chamot; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Mammography screening of women in their 40s: impact of changes in screening guidelines.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Albert Sun; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth B Claus; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  How old are African American women when they receive their first mammogram? Results from a church-based study.

Authors:  Janice V Bowie; Anita M Wells; Hee-Soon Juon; Kim D Sydnor; Elisa M Rodriguez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.