Literature DB >> 10824682

The functional influence of nicotinic cholinergic receptors on the visual responses of neurones in the superficial superior colliculus.

K E Binns1, T E Salt.   

Abstract

In the rat, the superficial gray layer (SGS) of the superior colliculus receives glutamatergic projections from the contralateral retina and from the visual cortex. A few fibers from the ipsilateral retina also directly innervate the SGS, but most of the ipsilateral visual input is provided by cholinergic afferents from the opposing parabigeminal nucleus (PBG). Thus, visual input carried by cholinergic afferents may have a functional influence on the responses of SGS neurones. When single neuronal extracellular recording and iontophoretic drug application were employed to examine this possibility, cholinergic agonists were found to depress responses to visual stimulation. Lobeline and 1-acetyl-4-methylpiperazine both depressed visually evoked activity and had a tendency to reduce the background firing rate of the neurones. Carbachol depressed the visual responses without any significant effect on the ongoing activity, while the muscarinic receptor selective agonist methacholine increased the background activity of the neurones and reduced their visual responses. Lobeline was chosen for further studies on the role of nicotinic receptors in SGS. Given that nicotinic receptors are associated with retinal terminals in SGS, and that the activation of presynaptic nicotinic receptors normally facilitates transmitter release (in this case glutamate release), the depressant effects of nicotinic agonists are intriguing. However, many retinal afferents contact inhibitory neurones in SGS; thus it is possible that the increase in glutamate release in turn facilitates the liberation of GABA which goes on to inhibit the visual responses. We therefore attempted to reverse the effects of lobeline with GABA receptor antagonists. The depressant effects of lobeline on the visual response could not be reversed by the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline, but the GABA(B) antagonist CGP 35348 reduced the effects of lobeline. We hypothesize that cholinergic drive from the parabigeminal nucleus may activate presynaptic nicotinic receptors on retinal terminals, thereby facilitating the release of glutamate onto inhibitory neurones. Consequently GABA is released, activating GABA(B) receptors, and thus the ultimate effect of nicotinic receptor activation is to depress visual responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10824682     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800172116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  15 in total

1.  Bidirectional modulation of visual plasticity by cholinergic receptor subtypes in the frog optic tectum.

Authors:  Chuan-Jiang Yu; Christopher M Butt; Elizabeth A Debski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  The effects of nicotinic and muscarinic receptor activation on patch-clamped cells in the optic tectum of Rana pipiens.

Authors:  C-J Yu; E A Debski
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Abnormal air righting behaviour in the spontaneously hypertensive rat model of ADHD.

Authors:  Eleanor J Dommett; Claire L Rostron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.

Authors:  Dihui Lai; Sebastian Brandt; Harald Luksch; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Exploring the superior colliculus in vitro.

Authors:  Tadashi Isa; William C Hall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cholinergic control of gamma power in the midbrain spatial attention network.

Authors:  Astra S Bryant; C Alex Goddard; John R Huguenard; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Control from below: the role of a midbrain network in spatial attention.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Electrophysiological properties of isthmic neurons in frogs revealed by in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Matthew S Caudill; Adam T Eggebrecht; Edward R Gruberg; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Excitatory and inhibitory circuitry in the superficial gray layer of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  P H Lee; M Schmidt; W C Hall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.