Literature DB >> 12676145

The effects of nicotinic and muscarinic receptor activation on patch-clamped cells in the optic tectum of Rana pipiens.

C-J Yu1, E A Debski.   

Abstract

Both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors are present in the optic tectum. To begin to understand how the activation of these receptors affects visual activity patterns, we have determined the types of physiological responses induced by their activation. Using tectal brain slices from the leopard frog, we found that application of nicotine (100 microM) evoked long-lasting responses in 60% of patch-clamped tectal cells. Thirty percent of these responses consisted of an increase in spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs) and had both a glutamatergic and GABAergic component as determined by the use of 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (50 microM) and bicuculline (25 microM), respectively. Remaining response types consisted of an inward membrane current (16%) and an increase in sPSCs combined with an inward membrane current (14%). All responses could be elicited in the presence of tetrodotoxin (0.5 microM). Muscarinic receptor-mediated responses, induced by carbachol (100 microM) application after nicotinic receptor desensitization, produced responses in 70% of tectal cells. In contrast to responses elicited by nicotine, carbachol-induced responses could be evoked multiple times without significant decrement. Responses consisted of either an outward current (57%), a decrease in sPSCs (5%) or an increase in sPSCs, with (almost 6%) or without (almost 3%) an outward current. The response elicited by carbachol was not predicted by the response of the cell to nicotine. Our results suggest that nicotinic receptors are found predominantly at presynaptic locations in the optic tectum while muscarinic receptors are most often present at postsynaptic sites. We conclude that both of these receptor types could substantially modulate visual activity by changing either the input to tectal neurons or the level of their response to that input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12676145      PMCID: PMC2265077          DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00768-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  59 in total

1.  Characterization and autoradiographic distribution of [3H]AF-DX 384 binding to putative muscarinic M2 receptors in the rat brain.

Authors:  I Aubert; D Cécyre; S Gauthier; R Quirion
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-07-07       Impact factor: 4.432

2.  A light- and electron-microscopic investigation of the optic tectum of the frog, Rana pipiens, II: The neurons that give rise to the crossed tecto-bulbar pathway.

Authors:  T E Hughes
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Behavioral and physiological consequences of unilateral ablation of the nucleus isthmi in the leopard frog.

Authors:  E R Gruberg; M T Wallace; H S Caine; M I Mote
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  The long latency component of retinotectal transmission: enhancement by stimulation of nucleus isthmi or tectobulbar tract and block by nicotinic cholinergic antagonists.

Authors:  W M King; J T Schmidt
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Lesions of nonvisual inputs affect plasticity, norepinephrine content, and acetylcholine content of visual cortex.

Authors:  B Gordon; B Mitchell; K Mohtadi; E Roth; Y Tseng; F Turk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Pharmacological induction of use-dependent receptive field modifications in the visual cortex.

Authors:  J M Greuel; H J Luhmann; W Singer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Ultrastructure of the crossed isthmotectal projection in Xenopus frogs.

Authors:  S B Udin; M D Fisher; J J Norden
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-02-08       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Postsynaptic potentials and morphology of tectal cells responding to electrical stimulation of the bullfrog nucleus isthmi.

Authors:  S R Wang; N Matsumoto
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  [3H]nicotine binding sites are associated with mammalian optic nerve terminals.

Authors:  G T Prusky; M S Cynader
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  An electrophysiological study of the action of N-methyl-D-aspartate on excitatory synaptic transmission in the optic tectum of the frog in vitro.

Authors:  A Nistri; L Sivilotti; D M Welsh
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bidirectional modulation of visual plasticity by cholinergic receptor subtypes in the frog optic tectum.

Authors:  Chuan-Jiang Yu; Christopher M Butt; Elizabeth A Debski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Muscarinic inhibition of recurrent glutamatergic excitation in frog tectum column prevents NMDA receptor activation on efferent neuron.

Authors:  Armantas Baginskas; Antanas Kuras
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Electrophysiological properties of isthmic neurons in frogs revealed by in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Matthew S Caudill; Adam T Eggebrecht; Edward R Gruberg; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Stimulus-driven competition in a cholinergic midbrain nucleus.

Authors:  Ali Asadollahi; Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Distinct mechanisms for top-down control of neural gain and sensitivity in the owl optic tectum.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.