Literature DB >> 10821614

The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors.

C M Nevison1, C J Barnard, R J Beynon, J L Hurst.   

Abstract

Extreme inbreeding will compromise an animal's ability to discriminate between individuals and, thus, assess familiarity and kinship with conspecifics. In rodents, a large component of individual recognition is mediated through chemical communication. The counter-marking of competitor males' scent marks provides a measure of discrimination between their own scent and that from other individuals. We investigated whether males in common outbred (ICR(CD-1) and TO) and inbred (BALB/c) strains of laboratory mice could recognize the urinary scents of other individuals by measuring their investigation and counter-marking responses. Dominant males of outbred strains investigated and counter-marked scents from other males, whether of the same or another strain. Dominant inbred BALB/c males investigated but did not counter-mark their own strain scents, counter-marking only those from another strain. They did not use environmentally induced status differences in odours to recognize scents from other males. The inability of the inbred mice to discriminate between their own scent marks and those of other males is likely to alter their competitive behaviour, which could influence responses in experiments and the welfare of caged laboratory mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10821614      PMCID: PMC1690593          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Individual variability and immunity.

Authors:  J J Cohen
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 3.  Of mice and kin: the functional significance of kin bias in social behaviour.

Authors:  C J Barnard; J L Hurst; P Aldhous
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1991-11

Review 4.  The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  V Apanius; D Penn; P R Slev; L R Ruff; W K Potts
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party.

Authors:  M Jennings; G R Batchelor; P F Brain; A Dick; H Elliott; R J Francis; R C Hubrecht; J L Hurst; D B Morton; A G Peters; R Raymond; G D Sales; C M Sherwin; C West
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats.

Authors:  R E Brown; P B Singh; B Roser
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1987

7.  Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in house mice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  MHC-associated and MHC-independent urinary chemosignals in mice.

Authors:  F Eggert; C Höller; D Luszyk; W Müller-Ruchholtz; R Ferstl
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1996-01

9.  Removal of the preputial glands alters the individual odors of male MHC-congenic mice and the preferences of females for these odors.

Authors:  K Ninomiya; R E Brown
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1995-07

10.  Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi; K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; J Bard; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  18 in total

1.  Influence of animal husbandry practices on void spot assay outcomes in C57BL/6J male mice.

Authors:  Kimberly P Keil; Lisa L Abler; Helene M Altmann; Wade Bushman; Paul C Marker; Lingjun Li; William A Ricke; Dale E Bjorling; Chad M Vezina
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Scent marking behavior in male C57BL/6J mice: sexual and developmental determination.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Murine pheromone proteins constitute a context-dependent combinatorial code governing multiple social behaviors.

Authors:  Angeldeep W Kaur; Tobias Ackels; Tsung-Han Kuo; Annika Cichy; Sandeepa Dey; Cristen Hays; Maria Kateri; Darren W Logan; Tobias F Marton; Marc Spehr; Lisa Stowers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Major urinary protein levels are associated with social status and context in mouse social hierarchies.

Authors:  Won Lee; Amber Khan; James P Curley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The level of major urinary proteins is socially regulated in wild Mus musculus musculus.

Authors:  Katerina Janotova; Pavel Stopka
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Chemical signal mediated premating reproductive isolation in a marine polychaete, Neanthes acuminata (arenaceodentata).

Authors:  R Sutton; E Bolton; H D Bartels-Hardege; M Eswards; D J Reish; J D Hardege
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Keiko Arakawa; Christopher Dunlap; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  A new test paradigm for social recognition evidenced by urinary scent marking behavior in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The ownership signature in mouse scent marks is involatile.

Authors:  C M Nevison; S Armstrong; R J Beynon; R E Humphries; J L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Social features of scent-donor mice modulate scent marking of C57BL/6J recipient males.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.