Literature DB >> 6946517

Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse.

M Yamaguchi, K Yamazaki, G K Beauchamp, J Bard, L Thomas, E A Boyse.   

Abstract

It has been shown that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) types affect the mating choices of mice and that mice can be trained to distinguish arms of a Y maze scented by odors from MHC-congeneic mice. It is now shown that sensory discrimination of MHC types by trained mice in the Y maze is equally effective with urine as the source of odors. Trained mice, male and female, successfully distinguished between urines of MHC-dissimilar F2 segregants of an MHC-congeneic cross but not between urines of MHC-identical F2 segregants. In a control study with a transfer of training procedure, in which reward was withheld to eliminate any basis for new learning, the trained mice successfully distinguished between urines from panels of MHC-congeneic inbred and F2 segregant congeneic mice that had not previously been used as urine donors. Thus urine, which is a source of chemosensory signals in many species, is also a potent source of the MHC-determined odors that distinguish individual mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6946517      PMCID: PMC348873          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks.

Authors:  B J Fellows
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; E A Boyse; V Miké; H T Thaler; B J Mathieson; J Abbott; J Boyse; Z A Zayas; L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-11-02       Impact factor: 14.307

3.  Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; M Yamaguchi; L Baranoski; J Bard; E A Boyse; L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1979-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  3 in total
  73 in total

1.  Olfactory fingerprints for major histocompatibility complex-determined body odors.

Authors:  M L Schaefer; D A Young; D Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors.

Authors:  C M Nevison; C J Barnard; R J Beynon; J L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Influence of animal husbandry practices on void spot assay outcomes in C57BL/6J male mice.

Authors:  Kimberly P Keil; Lisa L Abler; Helene M Altmann; Wade Bushman; Paul C Marker; Lingjun Li; William A Ricke; Dale E Bjorling; Chad M Vezina
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Odor types determined by the major histocompatibility complex in germfree mice.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; Y Imai; J Bard; S P Phelan; L Thomas; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The scent of age.

Authors:  Kazumi Osada; Kunio Yamazaki; Maryanne Curran; Judith Bard; Benjamin P C Smith; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Chemical identification of MHC-influenced volatile compounds in mouse urine. I: Quantitative Proportions of Major Chemosignals.

Authors:  Milos V Novotny; Helena A Soini; Sachiko Koyama; Donald Wiesler; Kevin E Bruce; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Individual odortypes: interaction of MHC and background genes.

Authors:  Alan Willse; Jae Kwak; Kunio Yamazaki; George Preti; Jon H Wahl; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  Central Control Circuit for Context-Dependent Micturition.

Authors:  Xun Helen Hou; Minsuk Hyun; Julian Taranda; Kee Wui Huang; Emmalee Todd; Danielle Feng; Emily Atwater; Donyell Croney; Mark Lawrence Zeidel; Pavel Osten; Bernardo Luis Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Evidence suggesting that the odortypes of pregnant women are a compound of maternal and fetal odortypes.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; K Katahira; K Yamazaki; J A Mennella; J Bard; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Keiko Arakawa; Christopher Dunlap; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.