Literature DB >> 10600138

Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in house mice.

.   

Abstract

Major urinary proteins (MUPs) in the urine of male house mice, Mus domesticus, bind the male signalling volatiles 2- sec -butyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole (thiazole) and 3,4-dehydro- exo -brevicomin (brevicomin) and slowly release these volatiles from urinary scent marks. To examine the role of urinary proteins and volatiles, either attached or unattached to the proteins, in competitive scent marking, we fractionated urine from isolated male BALB/c laboratory mice, Mus musculus, by size-exclusion chromatography into three pools. Pool I contained all of the urinary proteins and their bound ligands while pools II and III contained lower molecular weight components including unbound signalling volatiles. In experiment 1, pools I-III were streaked out on to absorbent paper (Benchkote) and introduced into enclosures housing single wild-caught male mice, together with a clean control surface. Each male was tested with fresh stimuli and with aged stimuli deposited 24 h previously. Only pool I stimulated significantly more countermarking and investigation than the control, attracting mice to investigate from a distance even when the rate of ligand release was considerably reduced after 24 h. Experiment 2 examined responses to pool I when this was fresh, aged by 7 days, or had been mixed with menadione to displace ligands from the proteins. Although all three protein stimuli were investigated and countermarked more than a clean control, the aged and menadione-treated pool I stimulated the strongest responses, despite containing the lowest levels of thiazole and brevicomin. Thus competitive countermarking is stimulated by proteins or by nonvolatile protein-ligand complexes in male urine, while release of volatile ligands attracts attention to a competitor's scent marks. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10600138     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  28 in total

1.  The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors.

Authors:  C M Nevison; C J Barnard; R J Beynon; J L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Scent marking behavior in male C57BL/6J mice: sexual and developmental determination.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Murine pheromone proteins constitute a context-dependent combinatorial code governing multiple social behaviors.

Authors:  Angeldeep W Kaur; Tobias Ackels; Tsung-Han Kuo; Annika Cichy; Sandeepa Dey; Cristen Hays; Maria Kateri; Darren W Logan; Tobias F Marton; Marc Spehr; Lisa Stowers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Mouse models of autism: testing hypotheses about molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Florence I Roullet; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011

5.  Superoxide dismutase deficiency impairs olfactory sexual signaling and alters bioenergetic function in mice.

Authors:  Michael Garratt; Nicolas Pichaud; Elias N Glaros; Anthony John Kee; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Searching for major urinary proteins (MUPs) as chemosignals in urine of subterranean rodents.

Authors:  Petra Hagemeyer; Sabine Begall; Katerina Janotova; Josephine Todrank; Giora Heth; Petr L Jedelsky; Hynek Burda; Pavel Stopka
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Keiko Arakawa; Christopher Dunlap; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  A new test paradigm for social recognition evidenced by urinary scent marking behavior in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The ownership signature in mouse scent marks is involatile.

Authors:  C M Nevison; S Armstrong; R J Beynon; R E Humphries; J L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Social features of scent-donor mice modulate scent marking of C57BL/6J recipient males.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.