Literature DB >> 10816295

Elastic recoil of coronary stents: a comparative analysis.

P Barragan1, R Rieu, V Garitey, P O Roquebert, J Sainsous, M Silvestri, G Bayet.   

Abstract

Minimum elastic recoil (ER) has became an essential feature of new coronary stents when deployed in artheromatous lesions of various morphologies. The ER of coronary stent might be an important component of 6-month restenosis rate by minimizing the luminal loss. We evaluated the intrinsic ER of 23 coronary stents with a mechanical test bench. The amount of ER for one size of stent (3.0 mm) was quantified using a 3D optical contactless machine (Smartscope MVP, Rochester, NY). The stents were expanded on their own balloon for the precrimped stents; the uncrimped stents were expended using identical 3.0-mm balloons. Two types of measurements were done without exterior stress and with a 0.2-bar exterior stress, directly on the stent at the end of balloon expansion, immediately after balloon deflation, and then 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min after. ER ranged from 1.54%+/-0.81% (Bestent BES 15) to 16.51%+/-2.89% (Paragon stent) without stress (P<0.01) and from 2.35%+/-1.14% (Bestent BES 15) to 18.34%+/-2.41% (Cook GR2) under 0.2-bar pressure (P<0.0001). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction between the mean result of tubular stents (TS) and coil stents (CS). The results of in vitro mechanical tests may confirm strongly the interest of a minimum ER in the prevention of the 6-month restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10816295     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200005)50:1<112::aid-ccd25>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Mechanism of lumen enlargement with direct stenting versus predilatation stenting: influence of remodelling and plaque characteristics assessed by volumetric intracoronary ultrasound.

Authors:  G Finet; N J Weissman; G S Mintz; L F Satler; K M Kent; J R Laird; G A Adelmann; A E Ajani; M T Castagna; G Rioufol; A D Pichard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Coronary artery stents: identification and evaluation.

Authors:  J Butany; K Carmichael; S W Leong; M J Collins
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Compliance charts to guide non-complex small artery stenting: validation by quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Yohan Chacko; J Kimberly Haladyn; Debbie M Smith; Richard Lim
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-31

4.  [New developments in drug-eluting stents].

Authors:  M Kollum; C Bode
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Stent expansion: a combination of delivery balloon underexpansion and acute stent recoil reduces predicted stent diameter irrespective of reference vessel size.

Authors:  Shahid Aziz; John L Morris; Raphael A Perry; Rodney H Stables
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Multi-objective optimisation of material properties and strut geometry for poly(L-lactic acid) coronary stents using response surface methodology.

Authors:  Ross W Blair; Nicholas J Dunne; Alex B Lennon; Gary H Menary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.