BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional MR imaging does not provide specific information that can be reliably associated with the pathologic substrate and clinical status of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Our goals were 1) to determine whether the orientationally averaged water diffusion coefficient (<D>) can be used to distinguish between plaques of different severity in these patients and 2) to assess possible correlations between <D> values and disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images. METHODS: Twenty patients (10 with relapsing-remitting MS and 10 with secondary-progressive MS) and 11 healthy volunteers underwent a combined conventional and diffusion-weighted MR study of the brain. <D>, a parameter that is proportional to the trace of the diffusion tensor, was computed by averaging the apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the x, y, and z directions. <D> measurements were obtained for selected areas of white matter plaques. Differences in <D> among the three groups were tested using analysis of variance. RESULTS: <D> was significantly higher (1.445 +/- 0.129 x 10(-3) mm2/s) in secondary-progressive lesions than in relapsing-remitting lesions (0.951 +/- 0.08), and both values were higher than <D> in normal white matter (0.732 +/- 0.02). There was a significant negative correlation between <D> and the degree of hypointensity on T1-weighted images, and a positive correlation between <D> and both EDSS score and disease duration. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that <D> is useful for distinguishing MS lesions of different severities, which are associated with different degrees of clinical disability.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional MR imaging does not provide specific information that can be reliably associated with the pathologic substrate and clinical status of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Our goals were 1) to determine whether the orientationally averaged water diffusion coefficient (<D>) can be used to distinguish between plaques of different severity in these patients and 2) to assess possible correlations between <D> values and disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images. METHODS: Twenty patients (10 with relapsing-remitting MS and 10 with secondary-progressive MS) and 11 healthy volunteers underwent a combined conventional and diffusion-weighted MR study of the brain. <D>, a parameter that is proportional to the trace of the diffusion tensor, was computed by averaging the apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the x, y, and z directions. <D> measurements were obtained for selected areas of white matter plaques. Differences in <D> among the three groups were tested using analysis of variance. RESULTS: <D> was significantly higher (1.445 +/- 0.129 x 10(-3) mm2/s) in secondary-progressive lesions than in relapsing-remitting lesions (0.951 +/- 0.08), and both values were higher than <D> in normal white matter (0.732 +/- 0.02). There was a significant negative correlation between <D> and the degree of hypointensity on T1-weighted images, and a positive correlation between <D> and both EDSS score and disease duration. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that <D> is useful for distinguishing MS lesions of different severities, which are associated with different degrees of clinical disability.
Authors: M A Horsfield; M Lai; S L Webb; G J Barker; P S Tofts; R Turner; P Rudge; D H Miller Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M Filippi; D W Paty; L Kappos; F Barkhof; D A Compston; A J Thompson; G J Zhao; C M Wiles; W I McDonald; D H Miller Journal: Neurology Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Derek Kenton Jones; Steve Charles Rees Williams; David Gasston; Mark Andrew Horsfield; Andrew Simmons; Robert Howard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Stephan E Maier; Hatsuho Mamata; Melissa Frumin; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: M Marrale; G Collura; M Brai; N Toschi; F Midiri; G La Tona; A Lo Casto; C Gagliardo Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Waqar Rashid; Andreas Hadjiprocopis; Gerard Davies; Collette Griffin; Declan Chard; Michaela Tiberio; Dan Altmann; Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott; Dan Tozer; Alan Thompson; David H Miller Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Anil N Shetty; Sharon Chiang; Mirjana Maletic-Savatic; Gregor Kasprian; Marina Vannucci; Wesley Lee Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 0.481