BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare diffusion tensor MR and magnetization transfer imaging in assessing normal-appearing white matter (WM) regions in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Diffusion tensor, magnetization transfer, and conventional MR imaging were performed in 12 patients with MS. Fractional anisotropy, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) were measured in plaques, normal-appearing periplaque WM (PWM) regions, and normal-appearing WM regions remote from plaques. Mean fractional anisotropy, ADCs, and MTRs were calculated and compared in WM regions. RESULTS: Fractional anisotropy was lower in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote WM regions (P <.001) but higher than in plaques (P <.001). MTRs were lower (not significantly, P =.19) in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote regions. MTRs were higher in normal-appearing PWM regions than in plaques (P <.001). ADCs were higher in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote regions (P =.008) but lower than in plaques (P =.001). Correlation between fractional anisotropy and MTRs of individual lesions was poor (r = 0.18) and between fractional anisotropy and ADC, modest (r = -0.39). CONCLUSION: In MS, diffusion tensor MR imaging can depict differences between WM regions that are not apparent on conventional MR images. Anisotropy measurements may be more sensitive than those of MTRs in detecting subtle abnormalities in PWM.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare diffusion tensor MR and magnetization transfer imaging in assessing normal-appearing white matter (WM) regions in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Diffusion tensor, magnetization transfer, and conventional MR imaging were performed in 12 patients with MS. Fractional anisotropy, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) were measured in plaques, normal-appearing periplaque WM (PWM) regions, and normal-appearing WM regions remote from plaques. Mean fractional anisotropy, ADCs, and MTRs were calculated and compared in WM regions. RESULTS: Fractional anisotropy was lower in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote WM regions (P <.001) but higher than in plaques (P <.001). MTRs were lower (not significantly, P =.19) in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote regions. MTRs were higher in normal-appearing PWM regions than in plaques (P <.001). ADCs were higher in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote regions (P =.008) but lower than in plaques (P =.001). Correlation between fractional anisotropy and MTRs of individual lesions was poor (r = 0.18) and between fractional anisotropy and ADC, modest (r = -0.39). CONCLUSION: In MS, diffusion tensor MR imaging can depict differences between WM regions that are not apparent on conventional MR images. Anisotropy measurements may be more sensitive than those of MTRs in detecting subtle abnormalities in PWM.
Authors: L Fu; P M Matthews; N De Stefano; K J Worsley; S Narayanan; G S Francis; J P Antel; C Wolfson; D L Arnold Journal: Brain Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: M Filippi; M Inglese; M Rovaris; M P Sormani; P Horsfield; P G Iannucci; B Colombo; G Comi Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J H van Waesberghe; W Kamphorst; C J De Groot; M A van Walderveen; J A Castelijns; R Ravid; G J Lycklama à Nijeholt; P van der Valk; C H Polman; A J Thompson; F Barkhof Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Yulin Ge; Meng Law; Glyn Johnson; Joseph Herbert; James S Babb; Lois J Mannon; Robert I Grossman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Waqar Rashid; Andreas Hadjiprocopis; Gerard Davies; Collette Griffin; Declan Chard; Michaela Tiberio; Dan Altmann; Claudia Wheeler-Kingshott; Dan Tozer; Alan Thompson; David H Miller Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Joshua S Shimony; Yvette I Sheline; Gina D'Angelo; Adrian A Epstein; Tammie L S Benzinger; Mark A Mintun; Robert C McKinstry; Abraham Z Snyder Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 13.382