PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the appearance of multiple sclerosis lesions identified on unenhanced T1-weighted images and their corresponding magnetization transfer ratios. METHODS: A total of 119 white matter lesions seen on T2-weighted images in 17 patients with multiple sclerosis were evaluated. Axial T1-weighted images were used to classify the lesions as isointense to white matter (10 lesions), hypointense to white matter but hyperintense to gray matter (44 lesions), hypointense to gray matter (59 lesions), and relatively isointense to cerebrospinal fluid (6 lesions). The magnetization transfer ratio of each lesion was calculated, and an average magnetization transfer ratio for each subcategory was determined. RESULTS: The magnetization transfer ratio values became progressively lower with increasing hypointensity of lesions on T1-weighted images. The average magnetization transfer ratio for lesions isointense to white matter, hypointense to white matter but hyperintense to gray matter, hypointense to gray matter, and relatively isointense to cerebrospinal fluid was 34.90 +/- 2.67 mean +/- SD), 30.93 +/- 3.57, 27.27 +/- 3.56, and 23.62 +/- 2.83, respectively. All groups were significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: Lesions isointense to white matter exhibited higher magnetization transfer ratio values than lesions that were hypointense. These findings are consistent with relative preservation of the myelin structure in the former, perhaps indicating that these lesions are predominantly inflammatory (edematous) in nature. The proportionately lower magnetization transfer ratio values of lesions that appear progressively more hypointense on T1-weighted images may reflect varying degrees of demyelination, with increasing lesion hypointensity corresponding to more breakdown in the macromolecular structure. These results suggest that T1-weighted images may be useful in characterizing the underlying pathologic substrate in multiple sclerosis plaques.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the appearance of multiple sclerosis lesions identified on unenhanced T1-weighted images and their corresponding magnetization transfer ratios. METHODS: A total of 119 white matter lesions seen on T2-weighted images in 17 patients with multiple sclerosis were evaluated. Axial T1-weighted images were used to classify the lesions as isointense to white matter (10 lesions), hypointense to white matter but hyperintense to gray matter (44 lesions), hypointense to gray matter (59 lesions), and relatively isointense to cerebrospinal fluid (6 lesions). The magnetization transfer ratio of each lesion was calculated, and an average magnetization transfer ratio for each subcategory was determined. RESULTS: The magnetization transfer ratio values became progressively lower with increasing hypointensity of lesions on T1-weighted images. The average magnetization transfer ratio for lesions isointense to white matter, hypointense to white matter but hyperintense to gray matter, hypointense to gray matter, and relatively isointense to cerebrospinal fluid was 34.90 +/- 2.67 mean +/- SD), 30.93 +/- 3.57, 27.27 +/- 3.56, and 23.62 +/- 2.83, respectively. All groups were significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: Lesions isointense to white matter exhibited higher magnetization transfer ratio values than lesions that were hypointense. These findings are consistent with relative preservation of the myelin structure in the former, perhaps indicating that these lesions are predominantly inflammatory (edematous) in nature. The proportionately lower magnetization transfer ratio values of lesions that appear progressively more hypointense on T1-weighted images may reflect varying degrees of demyelination, with increasing lesion hypointensity corresponding to more breakdown in the macromolecular structure. These results suggest that T1-weighted images may be useful in characterizing the underlying pathologic substrate in multiple sclerosis plaques.
Authors: Scott H Faro; Feroze B Mohamed; Joseph I Tracy; Robert M Elfont; Alexander B Pinus; Fred D Lublin; Robert A Koenigsberg; Cheng Y Chen; Fong Y Tsai Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexey Samsonov; Andrew L Alexander; Pouria Mossahebi; Yu-Chien Wu; Ian D Duncan; Aaron S Field Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: G J Barker; W G Schreiber; A Gass; J P Ranjeva; A Campi; J H T M van Waesberghe; J-M Franconi; H C Watt; P S Tofts Journal: MAGMA Date: 2005-03-22 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Belinda S Y Li; Juleiga Regal; Brian J Soher; Lois J Mannon; Robert I Grossman; Oded Gonen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.825