Literature DB >> 29546696

Improvement in OMERACT domains and renal function with regular treatment for gout: a 12-month follow-up cohort study.

Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado1,2, Ingris Peláez-Ballestas3,4, Rubén Burgos-Vargas3,4, Everardo Alvarez-Hernández3,4, Sergio García-Méndez3, Virginia Pascual-Ramos4,5, Marina Rull-Gabayet4,5.   

Abstract

OMERACT proposed a set of mandatory and discretionary domains to evaluate the effect of treatment in patients with gout. To determine the percentage of improvement and the effect size 6 and 12 months after starting a proper treatment in patients with gout from our cohort (GRESGO) based on the OMERACT proposal for chronic gout. GRESGO is a cohort of consecutive, new patients with gout attending either of two dedicated clinics. This report includes 141 patients evaluated at baseline and 6 months plus 101 of them completing a 12-month follow-up in 2012. Clinical data including the OMERACT domains for chronic gout were collected at baseline and every 6 months. Treatment was prescribed by their attending physician with the purpose of getting < 6 mg/dL of seric uric acid (sUA). Most patients were males (96%) with inappropriate treatment (95%); 66% had tophi, 30% metabolic syndrome, and 32% low renal function. Mean dose of allopurinol at baseline and throughout the study went from 344 ± 168 mg/day to 453 ± 198 at 12 months. Most OMERACT domains and renal function improved significantly; 73% improved > 20% from 6 to 12 months. Greater improvement was observed in the domains: flares, index tophus size, pain, general health assessment, and HAQ score, all of them associated to lower sUA values. Chronic gout patients improve significantly in most OMERACT domains when conventional and regular treatment is indicated. sUA < 6 mg/dL is associated with greater improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gout; Gout treatment; Metabolic syndrome; Urate; Uric acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546696     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4065-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  36 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  [EuroQol-5D: a simple alternative for measuring health-related quality of life in primary care].

Authors:  M Herdman; X Badia; S Berra
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Lowering serum uric acid levels: what is the optimal target for improving clinical outcomes in gout?

Authors:  Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Frédéric Lioté
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-10-15

5.  American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2017.

Authors:  Payal H Marathe; Helen X Gao; Kelly L Close
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.006

6.  Editorial: Do Not Let Gout Apathy Lead to Gouty Arthropathy.

Authors:  John D FitzGerald; Tuhina Neogi; Hyon K Choi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 10.995

7.  Serum urate in chronic gout--will it be the first validated soluble biomarker in rheumatology?

Authors:  Lisa K Stamp; Puja P Khanna; Nicola Dalbeth; Maarten Boers; Walter P Maksymowych; H Ralph Schumacher; Michael A Becker; Patricia A MacDonald; N Lawrence Edwards; Jasvinder A Singh; Lee S Simon; Fiona M McQueen; Tuhina Neogi; Angelo L Gaffo; Vibeke Strand; William J Taylor
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; John D Fitzgerald; Puja P Khanna; Sangmee Bae; Manjit K Singh; Tuhina Neogi; Michael H Pillinger; Joan Merill; Susan Lee; Shraddha Prakash; Marian Kaldas; Maneesh Gogia; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Will Taylor; Frédéric Lioté; Hyon Choi; Jasvinder A Singh; Nicola Dalbeth; Sanford Kaplan; Vandana Niyyar; Danielle Jones; Steven A Yarows; Blake Roessler; Gail Kerr; Charles King; Gerald Levy; Daniel E Furst; N Lawrence Edwards; Brian Mandell; H Ralph Schumacher; Mark Robbins; Neil Wenger; Robert Terkeltaub
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 9.  Outcome measures for acute and chronic gout.

Authors:  H Ralph Schumacher; Lawrence N Edwards; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Michael Becker; Lan X Chen; Daniel E Furst; Nancy Joseph-Ridge; Naomi Schlesinger; Zeb Horowitz; Kenneth Saag; Judith A Boice; Hisashi Yamanaka
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Tim L Th A Jansen; Nicola Dalbeth; Jaap Fransen; H Ralph Schumacher; Dianne Berendsen; Melanie Brown; Hyon Choi; N Lawrence Edwards; Hein J E M Janssens; Frédéric Lioté; Raymond P Naden; George Nuki; Alexis Ogdie; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Kenneth Saag; Jasvinder A Singh; John S Sundy; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado; Janitzia Vaquez-Mellado; Steven A Yarows; William J Taylor
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 10.995

View more
  1 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in the internet searches for gout: an ecological study.

Authors:  Sinan Kardeş
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.980

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.