Literature DB >> 10805838

Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis.

M Saito1, T Tsuyuguchi, T Yamaguchi, T Ishihara, H Saisho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic papillotomy is now considered established treatment for choledocholithiasis, therapeutic results of endoscopic papillotomy alone without subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystolithiasis have not been well evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for these patients.
METHODS: Patients admitted with choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis from 1976 to 1993 were studied retrospectively. Of 385 patients in whom the bile duct was cleared by endoscopic papillotomy and endoscopic stone extraction, 371 patients (195 men and 176 women; mean age 65.4 years) were followed. Predisposing risk factors for late complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 7.7 years. Cholecystitis and recurrence of choledocholithiasis as late complications occurred in 22 cases (5.9%) and 36 cases (9.7%), respectively. Cholecystitis, including 1 severe case, resolved with conservative treatment. Recurrent choledocholithiasis was successfully treated endoscopically except in 1 case. No significant risk factors were identified for cholecystitis. The presence of pneumobilia (p = 0.0016) and the need for lithotripsy (p = 0.0342) were found to be significant risk factors for the recurrence of choledocholithiasis.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis was found to be relatively favorable. Cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillotomy is not always necessary in the management of cholecystolithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10805838     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70286-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  25 in total

1.  Endoscopic Interventions in the Biliary Tract.

Authors:  Adolf Stiehl
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04

2.  Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Suzuki; N Abe; T Masaki; T Mori; Y Atomi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Expectant treatment of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years of age.

Authors:  R Costi; L Sarli; V Violi; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same session: feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Jin-Feng Zang; Chi Zhang; Jun-Ye Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Shinpei Doi; Ichiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Takahiro Yamauchi; Masanori Nakashima; Seiji Adachi; Masahito Shimizu; Eiichi Tomita; Takao Itoi; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 7.  Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Masahiro Hayashi; Jun-Ichi Senoo; Yuko Kusakabe; Shin Yasui; Rintaro Mikata; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-05-25

8.  Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy.

Authors:  T Ando; T Tsuyuguchi; T Okugawa; M Saito; T Ishihara; T Yamaguchi; H Saisho
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  D Keizman; M I Shalom; F M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Ten years of Swedish experience with intraductal electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones: an effective and safe option for octogenarians.

Authors:  Fredrik Swahn; Gunnar Edlund; Lars Enochsson; Conny Svensson; Bo Lindberg; Urban Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.