Literature DB >> 15542528

Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy.

M Sugiyama1, Y Suzuki, N Abe, T Masaki, T Mori, Y Atomi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) carries a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis but retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is safe and feasible. However, long term results of repeat ERCP and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown. AIMS: To investigate the long term outcome of repeat ERCP for recurrent bile duct stones after ES and to identify risk factors predicting late choledochal complications.
METHODS: Eighty four patients underwent repeat ERCP, combined with ES in 69, for post-ES recurrent choledocholithiasis. Long term outcomes of repeat ERCP were retrospectively investigated and factors predicting late complications were assessed by multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in all patients. Forty nine patients had no visible evidence of prior sphincterotomy. Two patients experienced early complications. During a follow up period of 2.2-26.0 years (median 10.9 years), 31 patients (37%) developed late complications, including stone recurrence (n = 26), acute acalculous cholangitis(n = 4), and acute cholecystitis (n = 1). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for choledochal complications: interval between initial ES and repeat ERCP < or =5 years, bile duct diameter > or =15 mm, and periampullary diverticulum. Choledochal complications were successfully treated with repeat ERCP in 29 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Choledochal complications after repeat ERCP are relatively frequent but are endoscopically manageable. Careful follow up is necessary, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct, periampullary diverticulum, or early recurrence. Repeat ERCP is a reasonable treatment even for recurrent choledocholithiasis after ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15542528      PMCID: PMC1774317          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2004.041020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  24 in total

1.  Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  D I Kim; M H Kim; S K Lee; D W Seo; W B Choi; S S Lee; H J Park; Y H Joo; K S Yoo; H J Kim; Y I Min; W B Chol
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Safety of extension of a previous endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christos Mavrogiannis; Christos Liatsos; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Dimitris I Psilopoulos; Spyros S Goulas; Andreas Romanos; Gerasimos Karvountzis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy: follow-up evaluation of effects on the sphincter of Oddi.

Authors:  J E Geenen; J Toouli; W J Hogan; W J Dodds; E T Stewart; P Mavrelis; D Riedel; R Venu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Studies of the choledocho-duodenal sphincter in patients with and without juxta-papillary duodenal diverticula.

Authors:  T Løtveit; M Osnes; S Aune; S Larsen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Long-term results after endoscopic papillotomy.

Authors:  J F Riemann; G Lux; P Förster; A Altendorf
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  W Rösch; J F Riemann; G Lux; H G Lindner
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence.

Authors:  G Costamagna; A Tringali; S K Shah; M Mutignani; G Zuccalà; V Perri
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Long-term follow-up study of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  O Jacobsen; P Matzen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Gallstones in Western Japan. Factors affecting the prevalence of intrahepatic gallstones.

Authors:  M Nagase; Y Hikasa; R D Soloway; H Tanimura; M Setoyama; H Kato
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct.

Authors:  J A Gregg; P De Girolami; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  S Sultan; J Baillie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Treatment of common bile duct stones in Sweden 1989-2006: an observational nationwide study of a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Andrew C de Beaux
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  Constantine Karaliotas; George Sgourakis; Constantine Goumas; Nickolaos Papaioannou; Constantine Lilis; Emmanouel Leandros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center.

Authors:  Hyung Mo Lee; Seog Ki Min; Hyeon Kook Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  Endoscopic papillary balloon intermittent dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bai-Qing Fu; Ya-Ping Xu; Li-Sheng Tao; Jun Yao; Chun-Suo Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Advantages of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ke-Yue Li; Cheng-Xian Shi; Ke-Li Tang; Jian-Zhao Huang; De-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Indication and surgical techniques of bypass choledochojejunostomy for intractable choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Dong-Hwan Jung; Sung Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-05-31

9.  An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction.

Authors:  D Keizman; M I Shalom; F M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Effect of medical or surgical admission on outcome of patients with gallstone pancreatitis and common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Jennifer LaFemina; Suzanne M Sokal; Yuchiao Chang; Deborah McGrath; David L Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.