Literature DB >> 12477771

Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy.

T Ando1, T Tsuyuguchi, T Okugawa, M Saito, T Ishihara, T Yamaguchi, H Saisho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) is not well known. The aims of this study were to clarify the clinical course of post-EPT patients and to detect predictors for bile duct stone recurrence.
METHODS: A total of 1042 consecutive patients who underwent EPT for bile duct stones from December 1975 to September 1998 were prospectively followed up. Patients were divided into four groups according to gall bladder (GB) status: "acalculous GB" group, "calculous GB" group, "cholecystectomy" group, and "prior cholecystectomy" group. Reliable follow up information was obtained for 983 (94.3%) of the 1042 patients. The following factors were considered in the evaluation of predisposing risk factors for recurrence of bile duct stones: age, sex, gall bladder status, periampullary diverticulum, number of bile duct stones, diameter of bile duct stones, diameter of bile duct, lithotripsy, precutting, pneumobilia, and early complications.
RESULTS: Recurrence occurred in 111 patients. The "acalculous GB" group was less prone to recurrence than the "prior cholecystectomy" group and the "calculous GB" group. The relative risks (RR) for the latter two compared with the former group were 2.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-4.14; p=0.0078) and 2.16 (95% CI 1.21-3.87; p=0.0093), respectively. Other prognostic factors were lithotripsy (RR 2.37; 95% CI 1.47-3.81; p=0.0004) and pneumobilia (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.01-2.43; p=0.044).
CONCLUSIONS: Gall bladder status, lithotripsy, and pneumobilia were significantly related to bile duct stone recurrence after EPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12477771      PMCID: PMC1773534          DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.1.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  28 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Longterm effects of endoscopic sphincterotomy on gall bladder motility.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Atomi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Approaches to sample size estimation in the design of clinical trials--a review.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M L Freeman; D B Nelson; S Sherman; G B Haber; M E Herman; P J Dorsher; J P Moore; M B Fennerty; M E Ryan; M J Shaw; J D Lande; A M Pheley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Biliary manometry, bacterial characteristics, bile composition, and histologic changes fifteen to seventeen years after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J J Bergman; A M van Berkel; A K Groen; M N Schoeman; J Offerhaus; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age.

Authors:  J J Bergman; S van der Mey; E A Rauws; J G Tijssen; D J Gouma; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  The role of bacteria in gallbladder and common duct stone formation.

Authors:  H S Kaufman; T H Magnuson; K D Lillemoe; P Frasca; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pigment gallstones form as a composite of bacterial microcolonies and pigment solids.

Authors:  L Stewart; A L Smith; C A Pellegrini; R W Motson; L W Way
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients without stones in the gallbladder.

Authors:  J M Benattar; F X Caroli-Bosc; A G Harris; R Dumas; J Delmont
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Bacteria and gallstones. Etiological significance.

Authors:  M Tabata; F Nakayama
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  48 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after peroral cholangioscopy-directed lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones, including Mirizzi syndrome: an analysis of risk factors predicting stone recurrence.

Authors:  Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Yuji Sakai; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Takeshi Ishihara; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms.

Authors:  Stefan Heinrich; Markus Schäfer; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Risk factors of acute cholecystitis after endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Jun Kyu Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Joo Kyung Park; Won Jae Yoon; Sang Hyub Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  [Acute pancreatitis].

Authors:  N Teich; S Leinung; S Jonas; J Mössner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  The clinical importance of different localizations of the papilla associated with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula.

Authors:  Bunyami Ozogul; Gurkan Ozturk; Abdullah Kisaoglu; Bulent Aydinli; Mehmet Yildirgan; Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Yoshiaki Kawaguchi; Nobuto Hirata; So Nakaji; Katsuya Kitamura; Shigeru Mikami; Tatsuya Fujimoto; Masashi Ijima; Eishin Kurihara; Shuhei Oana; Takayoshi Nishino; Ryo Tamura; Dai Sakamoto; Masato Nakamura; Takao Nishikawa; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Hitoshi Yoshida; Tetsuya Mine; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Yunxiao Cheng; Ting Li; Bin Cheng; Xin Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Risk factors for the late development of common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Shin Choi; Jae Hyuk Do; Suk Won Suh; Seung Eun Lee; Hyun Kang; Hyun Jeong Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The Impact of Gallbladder Status on Biliary Complications After the Endoscopic Removal of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Myung Hi Kim; Seong Jae Yeo; Min Kyu Jung; Chang Min Cho
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Methods and timing of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Masato Nagino; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Yuichi Yamashita; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Keita Wada; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Fumihiko Miura; Steven M Strasberg; Henry A Pitt; Jacques Belghiti; Sheung-Tat Fan; Kui-Hin Liau; Giulio Belli; Xiao-Ping Chen; Edward Cheuck-Seen Lai; Benny P Philippi; Harjit Singh; Avinash Supe
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.