Literature DB >> 10791840

Awareness predicts the magnitude of single-cue trace eyeblink conditioning.

J R Manns1, R E Clark, L R Squire.   

Abstract

Studies of differential eyeblink conditioning (CS+ and CS-) have demonstrated that successful conditioning requires awareness of the stimulus contingencies and that delay conditioning does not. Two experiments were carried out to determine whether awareness is also important for single-cue trace eyeblink conditioning. In experiment 1, participants who performed a secondary, attention-demanding task emitted significantly fewer conditioned eyeblink responses than participants who watched a silent movie during the conditioning session. In experiment 2, participants who became aware of the stimulus contingencies early in the conditioning session emitted significantly more conditioned responses during the remainder of the session than participants who became aware later in the session or who never became aware. These results indicate that awareness is important for single-cue trace eyeblink conditioning, just as it is for differential trace conditioning. The relationship between awareness and trace eyeblink conditioning is discussed in the light of these and other recent findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10791840     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(2000)10:2<181::AID-HIPO7>3.0.CO;2-V

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  25 in total

1.  Parallel acquisition of awareness and trace eyeblink classical conditioning.

Authors:  J R Manns; R E Clark; L R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Single-cue delay eyeblink conditioning is unrelated to awareness.

Authors:  J R Manns; R E Clark; L Squire
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Exploring prefrontal cortical memory mechanisms with eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C J Han; Colm M O'Tuathaigh; Laurent van Trigt; Jennifer J Quinn; Michael S Fanselow; Raymond Mongeau; Christof Koch; David J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nonpharmacological amelioration of age-related learning deficits: the impact of hippocampal theta-triggered training.

Authors:  Yukiko Asaka; Kristin N Mauldin; Amy L Griffin; Matthew A Seager; Elizabeth Shurell; Stephen D Berry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The effects of aging in delay and trace human eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Dominic T Cheng; Monica L Faulkner; John F Disterhoft; John E Desmond
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-09

7.  Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; Robert E Clark; Joseph R Manns; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Awareness is essential for differential delay eyeblink conditioning with soft-tone but not loud-tone conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  He Huang; Bing Wu; Qiong Li; Juan Yao; Xuan Li; Yi Yang; Guang-Yan Wu; Jian-Feng Sui
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  Hippocampal and cerebellar single-unit activity during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat.

Authors:  John T Green; Jeremy D Arenos
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 10.  Dual functions of perirhinal cortex in fear conditioning.

Authors:  Brianne A Kent; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.