Literature DB >> 10786318

Is there a coherent social conception of disability?

J Harris1.   

Abstract

Is there such a thing as a social conception of disability? Recently two writers in this journal have suggested not only that there is a coherent social conception of disability but that all non-social conceptions, or "medical models" of disability are fatally flawed. One serious and worrying dimension of their claims is that once the social dimensions of disability have been resolved no seriously "disabling" features remain. This paper examines and rejects conceptions of disability based on social factors but notes that physical and mental conditions which disadvantage the individual have social dimensions.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10786318      PMCID: PMC1733190          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.2.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Disability, gene therapy and eugenics--a challenge to John Harris.

Authors:  S M Reindal
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Patient and parental attitudes toward genetic screening and its implications at an adult cystic fibrosis centre.

Authors:  S P Conway; K Allenby; M N Pond
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.438

  3 in total
  14 in total

1.  Prevention of disability on grounds of suffering.

Authors:  S D Edwards
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Impairment, disability and handicap--old fashioned concepts?

Authors:  R B Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Disability and difference: balancing social and physical constructions.

Authors:  T Koch
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Looking for the meaning of dignity in the Bioethics Convention and the Cloning Protocol.

Authors:  Daniela-Ecaterina Cutas
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-12

Review 5.  Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance.

Authors:  R Bennett
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

6.  Consequentialism without consequences: ethics and embryo research.

Authors:  Sarah Chan; John Harris
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; G Owen Schaefer; Kelton Tremellen; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2015-04

8.  Reflections on genetic manipulation and duties to posterity: an engagement with Skene and Coady.

Authors:  David Turnball
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2002-10

9.  Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-12

10.  Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection".

Authors:  S D Edwards
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.