Literature DB >> 10785216

Tubal sterilization: focus on the U.S. experience.

C Westhoff1, A Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the frequency, effectiveness, and clinical sequelae of tubal sterilization with a focus on the U.S. experience.
DESIGN: A review of U.S. health care statistics and English-language literature using a MEDLINE search, bibliographies of key references, and U.S. government publications. PATIENT(S): Women seeking tubal sterilization. INTERVENTION: Tubal sterilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Effectiveness and long-term risks and benefits. RESULT(S): Half of the 700,000 annual bilateral tubal sterilizations (TS) are performed postpartum and half as ambulatory interval procedures. Eleven million U.S. women 15-44 years of age rely on TS for contraception. Failure rates vary by method with one third or more resulting in ectopic pregnancy. Reversal is most successful after use of methods that destroy the least tube. Evidence of menstrual or hormonal disturbance after TS is weak, although some studies find higher rates of hysterectomy among previously sterilized women. Decreased risk of subsequent ovarian cancer has been observed among sterilized women. CONCLUSION(S): Tubal sterilization is highly effective and safe. Failures, although uncommon, occur at higher rates than previously appreciated. Evidence for hormonal or menstrual changes due to TS is weak. Tubal sterilization is associated with decreased risk of ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Female Sterilization; Literature Review; North America; Northern America; Reversibility; Sterilization, Sexual; Tubal Occlusion; United States

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10785216     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00481-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities.

Authors:  A Malik; J D Mellinger; J W Hazey; B J Dunkin; B V MacFadyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Training of residents in laparoscopic tubal sterilization: long-term failure rates.

Authors:  Beth W Rackow; Maria C Rhee; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Effect of tubal sterilization technique on risk of serous epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard-Anderson; Kathryn S Handlogten; Rochelle J Molitor; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Amy L Weaver; Jennifer St Sauver; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Tubal Ligation Induces Quiescence in the Epithelia of the Fallopian Tube Fimbria.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tiourin; Victor S Velasco; Miguel A Rosales; Peggy S Sullivan; Deanna M Janzen; Sanaz Memarzadeh
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Tubal ligation and the risk of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Grace Wyshak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Deborah Bartz; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

7.  Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences.

Authors:  Debra B Stulberg; Yael Hoffman; Irma Hasham Dahlquist; Lori R Freedman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Weiva Sieh; Shannon Salvador; Valerie McGuire; Rachel Palmieri Weber; Kathryn L Terry; Mary Anne Rossing; Harvey Risch; Anna H Wu; Penelope M Webb; Kirsten Moysich; Jennifer A Doherty; Anna Felberg; Dianne Miller; Susan J Jordan; Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Jenny Chang-Claude; Anja Rudolph; Susanne Krüger Kjær; Allan Jensen; Estrid Høgdall; Elisa V Bandera; Sara H Olson; Melony G King; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Tamara Marees; Leon F Massuger; Anne M van Altena; Roberta B Ness; Daniel W Cramer; Malcolm C Pike; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen M Schildkraut; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Preprocedure patient preferences and attitudes toward permanent contraceptive options.

Authors:  Hector O Chapa; Gonzalo Venegas
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.