Literature DB >> 18465476

Training of residents in laparoscopic tubal sterilization: long-term failure rates.

Beth W Rackow1, Maria C Rhee, Hugh S Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic tubal sterilization with bipolar coagulation is a common and effective method of contraception, and a procedure much used to teach laparoscopic surgical skills to Obstetrics and Gynaecology residents (trainees); but it has an inherent risk of failure. This study investigated the long-term failure rate of this procedure when performed by Obstetrics and Gynaecology residents on women treated in their teaching clinics.
METHODS: From 1991 to 1994, Obstetrics and Gynaecology residents carried out 386 laparoscopic tubal sterilizations with bipolar coagulation at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Six to nine years after the procedure, the women concerned were contacted by telephone and data were collected about sterilization failure.
RESULTS: Two failures of laparoscopic tubal sterilization with bipolar coagulation were identified: an ectopic pregnancy and a spontaneous abortion. For this time period, the long-term sterilization failure rate was 1.9% (0-4.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term sterilization failure rate for laparoscopic tubal sterilization with bipolar coagulation performed by residents is comparable to the results of prior studies. These findings can be used to properly counsel women at a teaching clinic about the risks of sterilization failure with this procedure, and attest to the adequacy of residents' training and supervision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18465476      PMCID: PMC3107850          DOI: 10.1080/13625180801920180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  19 in total

1.  The benefits of using the loop ligature (Endoloop) laparoscopic sterilization procedure in a residency program.

Authors:  M T Parsons; D A Hill
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  1994

2.  Laparoscopic pomeroy tubal ligation: a comparison with tubal cauterization in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Dale C Robinson; Staci K Stewart; Rachel E Reitan; Richard S Gist; Glenn N Jones
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  H B Peterson; Z Xia; J M Hughes; L S Wilcox; L R Tylor; J Trussell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Sterilization failure, sterilization reversal, and pregnancy after sterilization reversal in Quebec.

Authors:  James Trussell; Edith Guilbert; Allison Hedley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Reducing bipolar sterilization failures.

Authors:  R M Soderstrom; B S Levy; T Engel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Analysis of sterilization failure in Brazil.

Authors:  K J Lassner; C H Chen; M W Oberle; T C da Trindade; H Aguinaga
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996.

Authors:  A P MacKay; B A Kieke; L M Koonin; K Beattie
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilisation.

Authors:  R Kulier; M Boulvain; D Walker; G Candolle; A Campana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

9.  ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 46, September 2003. (Replaces technical bulletin number 222, April 1996).

Authors:  Amy Pollack
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Method failures of laparoscopic tubal sterilization in a residency training program. A comparison of the tubal ring and spring-loaded clip.

Authors:  T G Stovall; F W Ling; G M Henry; G M Ryan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.