Literature DB >> 10782771

Evaluation of carotid stenosis by angiography: potential bias toward overestimated measurements introduced by prior interpretation of Doppler sonograms.

J Dix1, J Skrocki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries is routinely performed before catheter angiography, and its results may bias the subsequent interpretation of angiograms. We attempt to establish that Doppler sonography may show an exaggerated degree of carotid stenosis, introducing bias to the evaluation of carotid stenosis by subsequent catheter angiography.
METHODS: Angiograms of the carotid arteries obtained to evaluate potential carotid stenosis in patients who had undergone Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries were retrospectively reviewed (from 1993 to 1998). Readers who were blinded to the previous interpretations of the angiography and Doppler sonography results measured carotid stenosis. The results of Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries were not re-evaluated. Based on the original Doppler sonograms, stenoses were categorized as normal/mild (<30%), moderate (30-59%), severe (60-79%), and critical (80-99%). Within these categories, the differences between the original percent stenosis, as determined by angiography, and the blinded measurements were determined.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with angiographically measurable stenoses in 128 vessels were identified. The difference between the blinded readers was 3% (+/-8%), with no category statistically different from the other. The difference between original and remeasured stenoses in carotid arteries in the Doppler categories were as follows: mild stenosis, 2% (+/-9%); moderate stenosis, 6% (+/-15%); severe stenosis, 8% (+/-15%); and critical stenosis, 22% (+/-12%). A significant overestimation occurred in the severe (P < .05) and critical (P < .0001) stenosis categories. One third of patients with stenoses in the severe or critical Doppler category had significant stenoses on the original angiograms that were less than 60%, according to blinded remeasurement.
CONCLUSION: Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries has the potential to bias the subsequent interpretation of catheter angiography. Care must be taken to measure stenosis accurately, using strict criteria to determine the potential benefit of carotid endarterectomy for the individual patient and to ensure that the criteria for Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries are based on accurate catheter angiography measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782771      PMCID: PMC7976643     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  7 in total

1.  Carotid artery stenosis: external validity of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement method.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; A J Fox; B L Sharpe; H J Barnett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria.

Authors:  E I Bluth; A T Stavros; K W Marich; S M Wetzner; D Aufrichtig; J D Baker
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; R N Rankin; A J Fox; R B Haynes; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  How to measure carotid stenosis.

Authors:  A J Fox
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Vascular wall imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic carotid plaques: current state of the art and potential future of endovascular optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  B A Standish; J Spears; T R Marotta; W Montanera; V X D Yang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.