Literature DB >> 8421726

How to measure carotid stenosis.

A J Fox.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8421726     DOI： 10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  81 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes.

Authors:  S Aoki; H Nakajima; H Kumagai; T Araki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Treatment of atherosclerotic disease at the cervical carotid bifurcation: current status and review of the literature.

Authors:  J J Connors; D Seidenwurm; J C Wojak; R W Hurst; M E Jensen; R Wallace; T Tomsick; J Barr; C Kerber; E Russell; G M Nesbit; A J Fox; F Y Tsai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  O B Samuels; G J Joseph; M J Lynn; H A Smith; M I Chimowitz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques.

Authors:  T J Tegos; K J Kalomiris; M M Sabetai; E Kalodiki; A N Nicolaides
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Luca Remonda; Pascal Senn; Alain Barth; Marcel Arnold; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain.

Authors:  H J Jaeger; K D Mathias; R Drescher; E Hauth; G Bockisch; E Demirel; H M Gissler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  L J Kappelle
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Patrick J H de Koning; Elena Zudilova-Seinstra; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  [CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types].

Authors:  M Lell; K Anders; C Leidecker; W Lang; W Bautz; M Uder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.