D T Raphael1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA. raphaedt@umdnj.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acoustic reflectometry can be used to create a "one-dimensional image" of a cavity, such as the airway and lung, with the image displayed as an area-length curve. This pilot study was undertaken to determine whether acoustic reflectometry could be used to distinguish between an endotracheal and an esophageal intubation. METHODS: Ten adult patients underwent general endotracheal anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. The reflectometer wavetube was attached to an endotracheal tube, and a reflectometric profile was obtained of the endotracheal tube and the airway and lung cavity. After confirmation of tracheal intubation, a second endotracheal tube was placed in the esophagus. After four breaths were administered, a reflectometric profile of the endotracheal tube-esophagus cavity was obtained. RESULTS: The acoustic reflectometric profiles for tracheal and esophageal intubation profiles were distinctive and characteristic. For an endotracheal tube-airway cavity, the profile shows a constant cross-sectional area throughout the length of the endotracheal tube, followed by a rapid rise in the area past the carina. For an esophageal intubation, the profile shows constant cross-sectional area throughout the length of the endotracheal tube, followed by a sudden decrease in the cross-sectional area to zero. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, acoustic reflectometry within seconds, and without resort to capnography, was able to generate characteristic and distinctive area-length profiles for both endotracheal and esophageal intubation. Acoustic reflectometry may have a role in the emergency imaging of the airway, and in the immediate detection of esophageal intubations, particularly in cases of cardiopulmonary arrest in which the usual techniques for confirmation of breathing tube placement fail.
BACKGROUND: Acoustic reflectometry can be used to create a "one-dimensional image" of a cavity, such as the airway and lung, with the image displayed as an area-length curve. This pilot study was undertaken to determine whether acoustic reflectometry could be used to distinguish between an endotracheal and an esophageal intubation. METHODS: Ten adult patients underwent general endotracheal anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. The reflectometer wavetube was attached to an endotracheal tube, and a reflectometric profile was obtained of the endotracheal tube and the airway and lung cavity. After confirmation of tracheal intubation, a second endotracheal tube was placed in the esophagus. After four breaths were administered, a reflectometric profile of the endotracheal tube-esophagus cavity was obtained. RESULTS: The acoustic reflectometric profiles for tracheal and esophageal intubation profiles were distinctive and characteristic. For an endotracheal tube-airway cavity, the profile shows a constant cross-sectional area throughout the length of the endotracheal tube, followed by a rapid rise in the area past the carina. For an esophageal intubation, the profile shows constant cross-sectional area throughout the length of the endotracheal tube, followed by a sudden decrease in the cross-sectional area to zero. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, acoustic reflectometry within seconds, and without resort to capnography, was able to generate characteristic and distinctive area-length profiles for both endotracheal and esophageal intubation. Acoustic reflectometry may have a role in the emergency imaging of the airway, and in the immediate detection of esophageal intubations, particularly in cases of cardiopulmonary arrest in which the usual techniques for confirmation of breathing tube placement fail.