Literature DB >> 10778742

Mutational accessibility of essential genes on chromosome I(left) in Caenorhabditis elegans.

R C Johnsen1, S J Jones, A M Rose.   

Abstract

We have analyzed a region of approximately 5.4 million base pairs for mutations, which under standard laboratory conditions result in developmental arrest, sterility, or maternal-effect lethality in Caenorhabditis elegans. Lethal mutations were isolated, maintained, and genetically manipulated as homozygotes using sDp2--a duplication of the left half of chromosome I. All of the lethals and rearrangements used in this analysis were balanced by sDp2. Relatively low doses of mutagen, (approximately 15 mM ethylmethane sulfate; EMS), were used so as to limit the occurrence of second-site mutations, thus increasing the probability of recovering single nucleotide substitutions. Treatment of over 32,400 marked chromosomes resulted in 486 analyzed mutations. In this paper, we add 133 previously unidentified let genes, isolated in the EMS screens, and one let gene identified by a gamma-ray induced mutation, to our collection of 103 essential genes. We also recovered lethal alleles of genes for which visible mutants already existed. In total, eight deficiencies and alleles of 237 essential genes were identified. Eighty-nine of the previously unidentified let genes are represented by more than one lethal allele. Statistical analysis indicates a minimum estimate of 400 essential genes in the region of chromosome I balanced by sDp2. This region occupies approximately half of chromosome I, and contains over 1135 protein-coding genes predicted from the genomic sequence data. Thus, approximately one-third of the predicted genes are estimated to be essential. Of these approximately 60% are represented by lethal alleles. Less than 2% of the lethal-bearing strains recovered in our analysis, including the eight genetically definable deficiencies, carried more than one lethal mutation. Several screens were used to recover mutations for this analysis. Because all the mutations were isolated using the same balancer, under similar screening conditions, it was possible to compare intervals within the sDp2 region with each other. The fraction of essential genes that present relatively large targets for EMS was highest within the central cluster (dpy-5 to unc-13).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10778742     DOI: 10.1007/s004380051165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Gen Genet        ISSN: 0026-8925


  17 in total

1.  The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms.

Authors:  Eduard D Akhunov; Andrew W Goodyear; Shu Geng; Li-Li Qi; Benjamin Echalier; Bikram S Gill; J Perry Gustafson; Gerard Lazo; Shiaoman Chao; Olin D Anderson; Anna M Linkiewicz; Jorge Dubcovsky; Mauricio La Rota; Mark E Sorrells; Deshui Zhang; Henry T Nguyen; Venugopal Kalavacharla; Khwaja Hossain; Shahryar F Kianian; Junhua Peng; Nora L V Lapitan; Jose L Gonzalez-Hernandez; James A Anderson; Dong-Woog Choi; Timothy J Close; Muharrem Dilbirligi; Kulvinder S Gill; M Kay Walker-Simmons; Camille Steber; Patrick E McGuire; Calvin O Qualset; Jan Dvorak
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Bioinformatical assay of human gene morbidity.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Identification of Essential Genes in Caenorhabditis elegans with Lethal Mutations Maintained by Genetic Balancers.

Authors:  Shicheng Yu; Chaoran Zheng; Jeffrey Shih-Chieh Chu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Deletion polymorphism in wheat chromosome regions with contrasting recombination rates.

Authors:  Jan Dvorak; Zu-Li Yang; Frank M You; Ming-Cheng Luo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic sequence of a mutant strain of Caenorhabditis elegans with an altered recombination pattern.

Authors:  Ann M Rose; Nigel J O'Neil; Mikhail Bilenky; Yaron S Butterfield; Nawar Malhis; Stephane Flibotte; Martin R Jones; Marco Marra; David L Baillie; Steven J M Jones
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Retroviral insertions in the VISION database identify molecular pathways in mouse lymphoid leukemia and lymphoma.

Authors:  Keith C Weiser; Bin Liu; Gwenn M Hansen; Darlene Skapura; Kathryn E Hentges; Sujatha Yarlagadda; Herbert C Morse Iii; Monica J Justice
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans: toward a knockout for every gene.

Authors:  Edwin Cuppen; Eelke Gort; Esther Hazendonk; Josine Mudde; José van de Belt; Isaäc J Nijman; Victor Guryev; Ronald H A Plasterk
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Rapid mapping and identification of mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans by restriction site-associated DNA mapping and genomic interval pull-down sequencing.

Authors:  Sean M O'Rourke; John Yochem; Amy A Connolly; Meredith H Price; Luke Carter; Joshua B Lowry; Douglas W Turnbull; Nick Kamps-Hughes; Nicholas Stiffler; Michael R Miller; Eric A Johnson; Bruce Bowerman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Allelic ratios and the mutational landscape reveal biologically significant heterozygous SNVs.

Authors:  Jeffrey S-C Chu; Robert C Johnsen; Shu Yi Chua; Domena Tu; Mark Dennison; Marco Marra; Steven J M Jones; David L Baillie; Ann M Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The near demise and subsequent revival of classical genetics for investigating Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis: RNAi meets next-generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Bruce Bowerman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.