Literature DB >> 10777019

The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention.

L Dalzell1, M Orlando, M MacDonald, A Berg, M Bradley, A Cacace, D Campbell, J DeCristofaro, J Gravel, E Greenberg, S Gross, J Pinheiro, J Regan, L Spivak, F Stevens, B Prieve.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention through a multi-center, state-wide universal newborn hearing screening project.
DESIGN: Universal newborn hearing screening was conducted at eight hospitals across New York State. All infants who did not bilaterally pass hearing screening before discharge were recalled for outpatient retesting. Inpatient screening and outpatient rescreening were done with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and/or auditory brain stem response testing. Diagnostic testing was performed with age appropriate tests, auditory brain stem response and/or visual reinforcement audiometry. Infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss were considered for hearing aids and early intervention. Ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention were investigated regarding nursery type, risk status, unilateral versus bilateral hearing loss, loss type, loss severity, and state regions.
RESULTS: The prevalence of infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss was 2.0/1000 (85 of 43,311). Of the 85 infants with hearing loss, 61% were from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and 67% were at risk for hearing loss. Of the 36 infants fitted with hearing aids, 58% were from NICUs and 78% were at risk for hearing loss. The median age at identification and enrollment in early intervention was 3 mo. Median age at hearing aid fitting was 7.5 mo. Median ages at identification were less for infants from the well-baby nurseries (WBNs) than for the NICU infants and for infants with severe/profound than for infants with mild/moderate hearing loss, but were similar for not-at-risk and at-risk infants. Median ages at hearing aid fitting were less for well babies than for NICU infants, for not-at-risk infants than for at-risk infants, and for infants with severe/ profound hearing loss than for infants with mild/ moderate hearing loss. However, median ages at early intervention enrollment were similar for nursery types, risk status, and severity of hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Early ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention can be achieved for infants from NICUs and WBNs and for infants at risk and not at risk for hearing loss in a large multi-center universal newborn hearing screening program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10777019     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  23 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Initiators in processes leading to hearing loss identification in Finnish children.

Authors:  T I Marttila; J O Karikoski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Prelinguistic Vocal Development in Infants with Typical Hearing and Infants with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Suneeti Nathani Iyer; D Kimbrough Oller
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2008-09

4.  Timeliness of service delivery for children with later-identified mild-to-severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Meredith Spratford; Jacob Oleson; Anne Welhaven; Melody Harrison
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  Identification of Potential Barriers to Timely Access to Pediatric Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Lisa Zhang; Anne R Links; Emily F Boss; Alicia White; Jonathan Walsh
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study.

Authors:  H M Fortnum; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall; A C Davis; J M Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

7.  Meeting the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Standards in a Large Metropolitan Children's Hospital: Barriers and Next Steps.

Authors:  Rebecca Awad; Johanna Oropeza; Kristin M Uhler
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 8.  Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations.

Authors:  George X Papacharalampous; Thomas P Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios I Davilis; Ioannis E Xenellis; Stavros G Korres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Danielle S Ross; W June Holstrum; Marcus Gaffney; Denise Green; Robert F Oyler; Judith S Gravel
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

Review 10.  An Introduction to the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss Study.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.