Literature DB >> 31600386

Identification of Potential Barriers to Timely Access to Pediatric Hearing Aids.

Lisa Zhang1, Anne R Links2, Emily F Boss2, Alicia White2, Jonathan Walsh2.   

Abstract

Importance: Despite various barriers identified to early pediatric access to cochlear implantation, barriers to timely access to pediatric hearing aids are not well characterized. Objective: To identify socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors that may be associated with pediatric access to hearing aids. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 90 patients aged 1 to 15 years who were referred for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and evaluation for hearing aids at a single tertiary care academic medical center from March 2004 to July 2018. Children who did not receive both ABR testing and hearing aids at the same center were excluded from analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations of insurance type (private vs public), race/ethnicity (white vs other), primary language (English vs other), cause of hearing loss (complex vs not complex), zip code, hearing aid manufacturer, and severity of hearing loss (in decibels) with the duration of intervals from newborn hearing screening to ABR testing, from ABR testing to ordering of hearing aids, and from ABR testing to dispensing of hearing aids.
Results: Of the 90 patients, mean (SD) age was 5.6 (3.7) years, 56% were female, and 77 (86%) were non-Hispanic. Results of χ2 tests indicated significant assocations existed between public insurance and race/ethnicity and between public insurance and primary language other than English. Variables associated with the interval from newborn hearing screening to ABR testing included insurance type (mean difference, 7.4 months; 95% CI, 2.6-12.2 months) and race/ethnicity (mean difference, 6.9 months; 95% CI, 2.7-11.1 months). Increased delays between birth and a child's first ABR test were associated with public insurance (mean difference, 6.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-10.2 months) and race/ethnicity other than white (mean difference, 6.0 months; 95% CI, 2.3-9.7 months). The mean time from birth to initial ABR testing was a mean of 6 months longer for patients from non-English-speaking families than for those from English-speaking families (mean [SD] interval, 14.9 [16.3] months vs 9.0 [8.5] months), although the difference was not statistically significant. Severity of hearing loss was associated with a decrease in the interval from ABR testing to ordering of hearing aids after accounting for other potential barriers (odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9). Zip code and complexity of the child's medical condition did not appear to be associated with timely access to pediatric hearing aids. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that insurance type, race/ethnicity, and primary language may be barriers associated with pediatric access to hearing aids, with the greatest difference observed in time to initial ABR testing. Clinical severity of hearing loss appeared to be associated with a significant decrease in time from ABR testing to ordering of hearing aids. Greater efforts to assist parents with ABR testing and coordination of follow-up may help improve access for other at-risk children.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31600386      PMCID: PMC6802037          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  22 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Access to Cochlear Implantation in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children in Southern California.

Authors:  Omid Moshtaghi; Edward C Kuan; Hossein Mahboubi; Nima Khoshab; Shawn Zardouz; Amy Yuk-Yee Yau; Vanessa S Rothholtz; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention.

Authors:  L Dalzell; M Orlando; M MacDonald; A Berg; M Bradley; A Cacace; D Campbell; J DeCristofaro; J Gravel; E Greenberg; S Gross; J Pinheiro; J Regan; L Spivak; F Stevens; B Prieve
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Barriers to pediatric cochlear implantation: A parental survey.

Authors:  Charles Q Yang; Brian K Reilly; Diego A Preciado
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Utility of a multidisciplinary approach to pediatric hearing loss.

Authors:  Karen Ann Hawley; Donald M Goldberg; Samantha Anne
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Follow-up and Time to Treatment in an Urban Cohort of Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

Authors:  Vandra C Harris; Anne R Links; Julia M Kim; Jonathan Walsh; David E Tunkel; Emily F Boss
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Age at Intervention for Permanent Hearing Loss and 5-Year Language Outcomes.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Harvey Dillon; Laura Button; Mark Seeto; Patricia Van Buynder; Vivienne Marnane; Linda Cupples; Greg Leigh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Pediatric Hearing Aid Management: Challenges among Hispanic Families.

Authors:  Ana Caballero; Karen Muñoz; Karl White; Lauri Nelson; Melanie Domenech-Rodriguez; Michael Twohig
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Barriers to early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Shani Dettman; Dawn Choo; Richard Dowell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Parental decision-making in considering cochlear implant technology for a deaf child.

Authors:  Yuelin Li; Lisa Bain; Annie G Steinberg
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Delays in diagnosis of congenital hearing loss in rural children.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Kristin Bianchi; Cathy Lester; Jennifer B Shinn; Thomas J Gal; David W Fardo; Nancy Schoenberg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 6.314

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tele-Audiology: Current State and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kristen L D'Onofrio; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-01-10

2.  Development and validation of DeciBHAL-US: A novel microsimulation model of hearing loss across the lifespan in the United States.

Authors:  Ethan D Borre; Evan R Myers; Judy R Dubno; Gerard M O'Donoghue; Mohamed M Diab; Susan D Emmett; James E Saunders; Carolina Der; Catherine M McMahon; Danah Younis; Howard W Francis; Debara L Tucci; Blake S Wilson; Osondu Ogbuoji; Gillian D Sanders Schmidler
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Why and How.

Authors:  Patricia L Purcell; Nicholas L Deep; Susan B Waltzman; J Thomas Roland; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.