Literature DB >> 1559063

Need for open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a specialist breast clinic service.

J J Curtin1, M A Sampson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a breast clinic.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients sent for first mammogram to our open access service by general practitioners and breast clinic in the year April 1989 to March 1990.
SETTING: District general hospital serving 200,000 people before the introduction of breast screening.
SUBJECTS: 361 symptomatic women referred directly by general practitioners and 226 women referred by the breast clinic for first, non-screening mammograms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic reports on all patients. Final diagnosis in patients reported as having possible or probable neoplasm.
RESULTS: Of the women referred directly by general practitioners one (0.2%) was reported as showing probable malignancy (later histologically confirmed) and 15 (4%) as showing possible malignancy (on follow up none had proved malignancy). Of the women referred by the breast clinic 38 (17%) were reported as showing probable malignancy (all had confirmed carcinomas) and 35 (15%) as showing possible malignancy (19 (54%) had proved malignancy). 18 of the proved malignancies were in women under 50 years old, 26 were in women over 64 years, and 14 were in women of screening age. 54 (93%) of the 58 patients with proved breast cancer and an abnormal mammogram had a discrete breast lump.
CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners accurately divided women into low and high risk groups, resulting in few abnormalities being detected in patients referred directly for mammography. This suggests that an open access non-screening mammography service for general practitioners is unnecessary in an area with a specialist breast clinic. The large proportion of cancers in women outside of screening age emphasises the need for such clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1559063      PMCID: PMC1881373          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6826.549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  15 in total

1.  False alarms of breast cancer.

Authors:  W I Garstin; Z Kaufman; M Baum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-02-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  False alarms of breast cancer.

Authors:  J E Devitt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; C Wall; D V McFarlane; I S Simor; R Jong; B J Shapiro; L Audet; M Petitclerc; D Ouimet-Oliva
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Fine needle aspiration of the breast: importance of the operator.

Authors:  J M Dixon; J Lamb; T J Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Clinical, radiological and cytological diagnosis of breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  S Ashley; G T Royle; A Corder; A Herbert; P B Guyer; C M Rubin; I Taylor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Breast cancer missed by mammography.

Authors:  J E Martin; M Moskowitz; J R Milbrath
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Mammography in symptomatic women 50 years of age and under, and those over 50.

Authors:  R A Egeli; J A Urban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The accuracy of mammography alone and in combination with clinical examination and cytology in the detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Hansell; J C Cooke; C A Parsons
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population.

Authors:  M G Wallis; M T Walsh; J R Lee
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Features of mammorgraphically negative breast tumours.

Authors:  C J Cahill; P S Boulter; N M Gibbs; J L Price
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Open access mammography.

Authors:  A E Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-28

2.  Open access mammography.

Authors:  R F Bury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-28

3.  Mammography in symptomatic women attending a rapid diagnosis breast clinic: a prospective study.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; D Ravichandran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Accuracy of general practitioner referrals to a breast clinic.

Authors:  S K Marsh; T J Archer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Alice C Tompson; Nicholas Jones; Josh Brewin; Elizabeth A Spencer; Clare R Bankhead; Fd Richard Hobbs; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.