Literature DB >> 10765456

Parameter uncertainty and variability in evaluative fate and exposure models.

E G Hertwich1, T E McKone, W S Pease.   

Abstract

The human toxicity potential, a weighting scheme used to evaluate toxic emissions for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventories, is based on potential dose calculations and toxicity factors. This paper evaluates the variance in potential dose calculations that can be attributed to the uncertainty in chemical-specific input parameters as well as the variability in exposure factors and landscape parameters. A knowledge of the uncertainty allows us to assess the robustness of a decision based on the toxicity potential; a knowledge of the sources of uncertainty allows us to focus our resources if we want to reduce the uncertainty. The potential dose of 236 chemicals was assessed. The chemicals were grouped by dominant exposure route, and a Monte Carlo analysis was conducted for one representative chemical in each group. The variance is typically one to two orders of magnitude. For comparison, the point estimates in potential dose for 236 chemicals span ten orders of magnitude. Most of the variance in the potential dose is due to chemical-specific input parameters, especially half-lives, although exposure factors such as fish intake and the source of drinking water can be important for chemicals whose dominant exposure is through indirect routes. Landscape characteristics are generally of minor importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10765456     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007094930671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  6 in total

1.  An automated framework for compiling and integrating chemical hazard data.

Authors:  Leora Vegosen; Todd M Martin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; David E Meyer; Kathie L Dionisio; Peter Egeghy; Kristin K Isaacs; Paul S Price; Kelly A Scanlon; Yu-Mei Tan; Kent Thomas; Daniel Vallero; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Human Health Risk Assessment Applied to Rural Populations Dependent on Unregulated Drinking Water Sources: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Lorelei Ford; Lalita Bharadwaj; Lianne McLeod; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment.

Authors:  Jon A Arnot; Trevor N Brown; Frank Wania; Knut Breivik; Michael S McLachlan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Influence of global climate change on chemical fate and bioaccumulation: the role of multimedia models.

Authors:  Todd Gouin; James M Armitage; Ian T Cousins; Derek C G Muir; Carla A Ng; Liisa Reid; Shu Tao
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Standard inocula preparations reduce the bacterial diversity and reliability of regulatory biodegradation tests.

Authors:  Andrew K Goodhead; Ian M Head; Jason R Snape; Russell J Davenport
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.