| Literature DB >> 24043502 |
Andrew K Goodhead1, Ian M Head, Jason R Snape, Russell J Davenport.
Abstract
OECD ready biodegradability tests have been central to understanding the biodegradation of chemicals from a regulatory perspective for many decades. They are not fit for contemporary prioritisation of chemicals based on persistence, however, due to the low concentration of inocula used, short duration and high variability between tests. Two OECD standard inoculum pretreatment methods (settlement and filtration) were investigated to observe their effect on the probability of biodegradation and associated changes in bacterial community structure and diversity of inocula sourced from the activated sludge process of wastewater treatment plants. Both settlement and filtration were shown to dramatically and significantly reduce the probability and increase the variability of biodegradation of 4-nitrophenol compared to the use of unprocessed inocula. These differences were associated with a significant hundred-fold reduction in cell numbers and solids content and a significant shift in bacterial community structure that was sometimes accompanied by significant reductions in detectable operational taxonomic unit richness and evenness. The natural variation (between different environments) and variation due to differential selection of bacterial communities (by different pretreatment methods) is offered as an explanation for the historical high variability in standard OECD ready biodegradability tests.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24043502 PMCID: PMC4133024 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2064-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Typical solids, effluent and bacterial cell concentrations in OECD recommended RBTs (modified from OECD 1992a, b)
| OECD test designation | 301 A | 301 B | 301 C | 301 D | 301 E | 301 F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | DOC die away | CO2 evolution | MITI (I) | Closed bottle | Modified OECD screening | Manometric respirometry |
| mg/l SS | ≤30 | ≤30 | 30 | n/a | n/a | ≤30 |
| ml effluent added/l | ≤1 | ≤1 | n/a | ≤0.05 | 0.05 | ≤1 |
| Approx. cells/ml | 104–105 | 104–105 | 104–105 | 101–103 | 102 | 104–105 |
| Source of inoculum | ||||||
| 1. Activated sludge | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 2. Secondary effluent | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3. Surface water | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 4. Soil | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 5. Mixture of above | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Pretreatment options | ||||||
| 1. Settling for 30 min or 1 h | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2. Filtering through fine sieve | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| 3. Filter through a coarse filter paper | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 4. Preconditiona | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 5. Preculture with glucose/peptone | ✓ | |||||
n/a not applicable
aPre-conditioning consists of aerating the inoculum (in mineral medium) for 5–7 days at the test temperature but does not allow pre-adaptation to the test substance
Characteristics of the activated sludge sampled from Tudhoe Mill and Sedgeletch wastewater treatment plants before and after pretreatment by filtration for inocula preparation according to international guidelines (OECD 1992a, b)
| WWTP | Sample | Sludge age (days) | Total suspended solids (TSS mg/l) | Total cell count (TCC × 107/ml)a | 4-Nitrophenol degraders (×103/ml)a | Mean OTU richnessa | Mean evennessa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tudhoe Mill | Activated sludge | 18 | 3,750 | 169 ± 92 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 27.8 ± 4.4 | 0.72 ± 0.07 |
| Filtrate | n/a | 76.5 | 1.63 ± 0.36 | n.d. | 22.2 ± 6.4 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | |
| Sedgeletch | Activated sludge | 8 | 3,250 | 801 ± 0.05 | 57.99 ± 0.06 | 19.8 ± 3.1 | 0.62 ± 0.04 |
| Filtrate | n/a | 12 | 14.7 ± 1.91 | n.d. | 16.2 ± 6.6 | 0.62 ± 0.04 |
n.d. not detected
aValues ± standard deviation
Fig. 2The probability of biodegradation of 4-nitrophenol as a function of cell concentration for inocula prepared according to the international standard OECD guidelines for biodegradation, a from the supernatant of settled activated sludge and b from filtered activated sludge samples together with those from their unprocessed counterparts. The cell concentrations/volumes used in current standard OECD biodegradation tests are shaded in grey and indicated by text. Error bars indicate standard deviation
Fig. 1DGGE gels showing differences in bacterial band richness and community structure with their respective dendrograms after cluster analysis based on the community similarity values for a the supernatant of settled activated sludge samples and the original unprocessed sample (the volumes used in current standard OECD tests are marked and the boxes indicate those bands that were excised and sequenced, Table S1) and b between filtered activated sludge samples and their unprocessed counterparts for samples from Tudhoe Mill and Sedgeletch wastewater treatment plants