Literature DB >> 10764366

Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care.

P Kinnersley1, E Anderson, K Parry, J Clement, L Archard, P Turton, A Stainthorpe, A Fraser, C C Butler, C Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain any differences between care from nurse practitioners and that from general practitioners for patients seeking "same day" consultations in primary care.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with patients allocated by one of two randomisation schemes (by day or within day).
SETTING: 10 general practices in south Wales and south west England.
SUBJECTS: 1368 patients requesting same day consultations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient satisfaction, resolution of symptoms and concerns, care provided (prescriptions, investigations, referrals, recall, and length of consultation), information provided to patients, and patients' intentions for seeking care in the future.
RESULTS: Generally patients consulting nurse practitioners were significantly more satisfied with their care, although for adults this difference was not observed in all practices. For children, the mean difference between general and nurse practitioner in percentage satisfaction score was -4.8 (95% confidence interval -6.8 to -2.8), and for adults the differences ranged from -8.8 (-13.6 to -3.9) to 3.8 (-3.3 to 10.8) across the practices. Resolution of symptoms and concerns did not differ between the two groups (odds ratio 1.2 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.8) for symptoms and 1.03 (0.8 to 1.4) for concerns). The number of prescriptions issued, investigations ordered, referrals to secondary care, and reattendances were similar between the two groups. However, patients managed by nurse practitioners reported receiving significantly more information about their illnesses and, in all but one practice, their consultations were significantly longer.
CONCLUSION: This study supports the wider acceptance of the role of nurse practitioners in providing care to patients requesting same day consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10764366      PMCID: PMC27347          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  GP frequent consulters: their prevalence, natural history, and contribution to rising workload.

Authors:  D Gill; M Dawes; M Sharpe; R Mayou
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice.

Authors:  J G Howie; A M Porter; D J Heaney; J L Hopton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Nurse-led management of minor illness in a GP surgery.

Authors:  M Rees; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1996 Feb 7-14

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity.

Authors:  B C Poulton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The patient-centredness of consultations and outcome in primary care.

Authors:  P Kinnersley; N Stott; T J Peters; I Harvey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Establishing a minor illness nurse in a busy general practice.

Authors:  G N Marsh; M L Dawes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-25

8.  Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Parent satisfaction with children's medical care. Development, field test, and validation of a questionnaire.

Authors:  C C Lewis; D E Scott; R H Pantell; M H Wolf
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Comparison of the work of a nurse practitioner with that of a general practitioner.

Authors:  C J Salisbury; M J Tettersell
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-07
View more
  71 in total

1.  Nursing and the future of primary care.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-15

2.  Doctors and nurses: doing it differently.

Authors:  J Salvage; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-15

3.  Quality, general practice, and the NHS plan.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Outreach clinics in the new NHS: not yet the end of outpatients.

Authors:  S Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Global nursing shortages.

Authors:  James Buchan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

6.  What is the role of walk-in centres in the NHS?

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Mel Chalder; Taj Manku Scott; Catherine Pope; Laurence Moore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-16

7.  The effect of GP telephone triage on numbers seeking same-day appointments.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Nigel Mathers; Mike Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Doctors and nurses. Let's celebrate the difference between doctors and nurses.

Authors:  P White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

Review 9.  Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.

Authors:  Suezann Puffer; David Torgerson; Judith Watson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

10.  Can nurse practitioners provide equivalent care to GPs? Nurses and doctors working together can complement each other.

Authors:  Catherine Baraniak
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.