Literature DB >> 10764107

Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition.

E E Cooper1, T J Wojan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the relations among the primitives used in face identification and in basic-level object recognition are represented using coordinate or categorical relations. In 2 experiments the authors used photographs of famous people's faces as stimuli in which each face had been altered to have either 1 of its eyes moved up from its normal position or both of its eyes moved up. Participants performed either a face identification task or a basic-level object recognition task with these stimuli. In the face identification task, 1-eye-moved faces were easier to recognize than 2-eyes-moved faces, whereas the basic-level object recognition task showed the opposite pattern of results. Results suggest that face identification involves a coordinate shape representation in which the precise locations of visual primitives are specified, whereas basic-level object recognition uses categorically coded relations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10764107     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.2.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition.

Authors:  L J Rosielle; E E Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Jonathan Guez; Michal Marom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

3.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Faraz Farzin; Bruno Rossion; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Recognition without picture identification: geons as components of the pictorial memory trace.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Moses M Langley; Kevin R Seiler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Attentional coding of categorical relations in scene perception: evidence from the flicker paradigm.

Authors:  Luke J Rosielle; Brian T Crabb; Eric E Cooper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

6.  The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Paul C Quinn; Buyun Xu; Kim Maynard; Natalie Huxtable; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-04-18

7.  Paying attention to binding: further studies assessing the role of reduced attentional resources in the associative deficit of older adults.

Authors:  Angela Kilb; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

8.  Key visual features for rapid categorization of animals in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Ghislaine Richard; Michele Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-23

9.  Processing of unconventional stimuli requires the recruitment of the non-specialized hemisphere.

Authors:  Yoed N Kenett; David Anaki; Miriam Faust
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Hemispheric differences in relational reasoning: novel insights based on an old technique.

Authors:  Michael S Vendetti; Elizabeth L Johnson; Connor J Lemos; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.